From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZkhi-00012T-Hh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:48:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZkhe-0007zo-9X for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:48:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44687) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZkhe-0007zh-4j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:48:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eZkhd-0004to-Tx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:48:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#28773] [PATCH] Wrap bin files in the ruby build system. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20171010084452.036b3052@cbaines.net> <877evvdycy.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 22:47:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Ben Woodcroft's message of "Wed, 18 Oct 2017 20:39:53 +1000") Message-ID: <87k1wom5j9.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ben Woodcroft Cc: 28773@debbugs.gnu.org Hello! Ben Woodcroft skribis: > On 16/10/17 23:19, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Hi Chris, >> >> Christopher Baines skribis: >> >>> This is a bit experimental. There is some description of the motivation >>> behind this approach, as well as the downsides in the commit messages. >>> >>> I don't know how to wrap binaries with the GEM_PATH, but somehow >>> excluding inputs specified as native-inputs, so I'd be very interested >>> if anyone has ideas about this. >>> >>> Christopher Baines (3): >>> ruby-build-system: Add wrap-ruby-program. >>> ruby-build-system: Add a new wrap phase. >>> gnu: Remove redundant wrapping from packages using ruby-build-system. >> Cc=E2=80=99ing Ben who is another Serious Ruby User I think. :-) > > Maybe sometimes. I'll try to get a review back to you in the next week > or so. Ahem. :-) Chris, if you=E2=80=99re confident, I=E2=80=99d say you can go ahead. It d= oes sound like an improvement so it=E2=80=99d be sad to lose it. Ludo=E2=80=99.