From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: proposal: with-file-writeable
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:51:08 +0100
Message-ID: <87k1vfsmr7.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAE4v=pivoQXNjQqhK3xSZurCyhvj7zXnhjM-UVaRh5XHKO6Buw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46615)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1elxSp-0002iR-Na
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 08:51:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1elxSp-00086F-3q
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 08:51:11 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a0c:e300::1]:55752)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1elxSo-000861-Sa
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 08:51:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAE4v=pivoQXNjQqhK3xSZurCyhvj7zXnhjM-UVaRh5XHKO6Buw@mail.gmail.com>
	(=?utf-8?Q?=22G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits"'s message of "Sat, 10 Feb 2018
	22:50:04 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> skribis:

> the make-file-writeable function seems a bit too imperative to me, it wou=
ld
> look better if we could have a with-file-writeable function, so that we c=
an
> constrain the size effect, and more. Moreover if a file is read-only to
> start with, it might be a good idea to keep it that way anyways. WDYT?

Which =E2=80=98make-file-writeable=E2=80=99 function?  I don=E2=80=99t see =
it in master.

Ludo=E2=80=99.