From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Testing the installer Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 21:47:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87k1r2bhab.fsf@elephly.net> References: <1EF06DDA-BEF2-494C-A49B-7AB1B9CEA29F@riseup.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTBjq-0005NF-2b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:47:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTBjl-00009g-RV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:47:26 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21007) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTBjl-000085-GN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:47:21 -0400 In-reply-to: <1EF06DDA-BEF2-494C-A49B-7AB1B9CEA29F@riseup.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: swedebugia Cc: Guix-devel Hi swedebugia, > I see two branches with wip-installer. > > What is the difference between those? Wip-installer2 having a newer maste= r merged in? The =E2=80=9Cwip-installer2=E2=80=9D is newer and has seen more work than t= he original =E2=80=9Cwip-installer=E2=80=9D, which has been abandoned. If you want to = work on it I recommend looking at =E2=80=9Cwip-installer2=E2=80=9D. > I would like to try installing via the installer to test it. Is it workin= g? I don=E2=80=99t know. From what I remember it still had some rather rough = edges and was less guided than you would expect from other installers. > Can the installer handle dual-boot detection/setup yet? I don=E2=80=99t think so. -- Ricardo