From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Lemmer Webber Subject: bug#33772: StumpWM broken commands? Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 09:47:14 -0500 Message-ID: <87k1k67uz1.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <878t0pqol1.fsf@dustycloud.org> <8736qvhym3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZGju-0004lQ-RL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 09:52:57 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZGjq-0000MQ-ES for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 09:52:54 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48520) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZGjo-00009a-5e for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 09:52:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gZGfC-0004bL-Jr for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2018 09:48:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <8736qvhym3.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 33772@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Christopher Lemmer Webber skribis: > >> It seems to me that StumpWM broke somehow, for some reason. I can >> confirm there was a version change: >> >> -sbcl-stumpwm@18.05:out /gnu/store/i0picr2xr2aq2a52nsaw67nvar1r3k= hw-sbcl-stumpwm-18.05 >> +sbcl-stumpwm@18.11:out /gnu/store/6h2iln76dx8pxdp1hsaqb1yncm8vic= zj-sbcl-stumpwm-18.11 >> >> I am not sure if this is the cause or something else. At any rate, when >> I try to run commands such as "gnew" (the command to make a new >> group/workstation) I get back: >> >> Error In Command 'gnew': invalid number of arguments: 2 >> >> I though I'd try running the command manually and check the error, but >> this also happens with eval! Some other commands are not affected. >> >> (I can try re-enabling the live REPL in StumpWM to play around with it, >> but I currently have it off because they have the same live hacking >> vulnerability in SBCL/SLIME that we had in Guile/Geiser some time ago.) > > Pierre, does that ring a bell? > > Others on the mailing list reported being happy with the upgrade, but > maybe they use different bits of StumpWM. > > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. I did a quick patch to see if downgrading would fix the problems I was having: #+BEGIN_SRC diff diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm index d8da2951d..18b68cb07 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm @@ -1020,6 +1020,19 @@ productive, customizable lisp based systems.") (license license:gpl2+) (properties `((cl-source-variant . ,(delay cl-stumpwm)))))) =20 +(define-public stumpwm-18.05 + (package + (inherit stumpwm) + (version "18.05") + (source (origin + (method url-fetch) + (uri (string-append + "https://github.com/stumpwm/stumpwm/archive/" + version ".tar.gz")) + (sha256 + (base32 "1n2gaab3lwgf5r1hmwdcw13dkv9xdd7drn2shx28kfxvhdc9kb= b9")) + (file-name (string-append "stumpwm-" version ".tar.gz")))))) + (define-public sbcl-stumpwm (deprecated-package "sbcl-stumpwm" stumpwm)) #+END_SRC The problems went away. I'd be curious to hear indeed if anyone else is having trouble making groups... if I'm the only one, I wonder what it could be about my configuration that is causing this.