From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQUZP-0001KT-Do for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 06:22:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQUZO-0004kt-FZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 06:22:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33941) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQUZO-0004kL-Ce for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 06:22:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQUZO-00081I-8A for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 06:22:02 -0400 Subject: bug#35666: [PATCH 0/2] Build a thread-safe hdf5 library Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20190510095630.16695-1-ludo@gnu.org> <87imuisf05.fsf@elephly.net> <87d0kq1mr2.fsf@gnu.org> <57ed425b87bca2f1fa72a936f3f8ca8caeadbb77.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 12:21:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <57ed425b87bca2f1fa72a936f3f8ca8caeadbb77.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> (Paul Garlick's message of "Fri, 10 May 2019 16:27:52 +0100") Message-ID: <87k1et1gmj.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Paul Garlick Cc: bavier@cray.com, 35666-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Paul, Paul Garlick skribis: > I notice in the Debian rules file [1] that the "--enable-threadsafe" > flag is listed as one of the SERIAL_FLAGS. In the Guix case the > package hdf5-parallel-openmpi inherits its configure flags from the > hdf5 (serial) package. > > Will we also have to explicitly delete the "--enable-threadsafe" flag > from the hdf5-parallel-openmpi definition? Good point, I think so. I did that and pushed it as 549d15712fdc1f58ce0dd11117eb79535ec19f2c. Let me know if anything is amiss! Ludo=E2=80=99.