Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> skribis:
>
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/guile-3.0-linux-syscalls.patch
>> @@ -0,0 +1,353 @@
>> +From 9d670c8045830a64fcbc6aac6ae6fd37335a7348 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> +From: Marius Bakke <marius@devup.no>
>> +Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:49:31 +0100
>> +Subject: [PATCH] port linux syscalls
>> +
>> +---
>> + libguile/posix.c | 330 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> + 1 file changed, 330 insertions(+)
>
> [...]
>
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/guile-3.0-relocatable.patch
>> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
>> +From 5bd112b292a2b177a479099cc06e998747025587 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> +From: Marius Bakke <marius@devup.no>
>> +Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:49:02 +0100
>> +Subject: [PATCH] add guile relocatable
>> +
>> +---
>
> For these two patches, could you preserve the same or a similar heading
> as the original patches?

Derp, I'm usually the one complaining about patch headers!

I've fixed this now, thanks for noticing.