From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qLa/BL34yV93PgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:52:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id wCabAL34yV9NEAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:52:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4712094030E for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 08:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58702 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kl6oz-0000mZ-7I for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:52:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34334) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kl6os-0000mS-En for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:52:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kl6os-0003vk-6u for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:52:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kl6os-0000TD-5V for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#45017: asdf-build-system packages have priority over user ones Resent-From: Pierre Neidhardt Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45017 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Guillaume Le Vaillant Received: via spool by 45017-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45017.16070719051784 (code B ref 45017); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:52:02 +0000 Received: (at 45017) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2020 08:51:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42562 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kl6ob-0000Sh-Bh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:51:45 -0500 Received: from relay2-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.194]:63201) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kl6oY-0000SS-EO for 45017@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 03:51:43 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 90.92.160.122 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1094-122.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.160.122]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay2-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBAAA4000A; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 08:51:35 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt In-Reply-To: <87ft4n2cax.fsf@yamatai> References: <87wnxzmdiy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87im9j2j06.fsf@yamatai> <87360nm5b1.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87ft4n2cax.fsf@yamatai> Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 09:51:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87k0tyuf6y.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45017@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.89 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4712094030E X-Spam-Score: -1.89 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: RX17eAVxGMdE --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for taking a shot at this, looks great! I'll test later, but for now one question: we patch sbcl to use our cl-asdf, but what about the other compilers? Seems to me that the other compilers are going to have the same problem, aren't they? =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAEBCAAwFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl/J+JUSHG1haWxAYW1i cmV2YXIueHl6AAoJEJvc9Jeku8x/K10H/2VuhxiF4YHgoTxeOKWR6ClXLuiHnGSg m+AO1F3osJpjbRf4QdBoHQuFo2Q0IVWbpiX4Y7ofUgHWgT6gLRucaVeeR0vxiMVu +JwIZ2XY2HIw1vUKM1iK3EBiLoLR2NSyoKiuZfeOMoFKdKLC2rRjuXnUqvXh4SFm rlx6EAELXPoLzNouU4PDGFcDrCcerG2JeBv4W+3TvkeOzGH8WdaDnFTzB2dzMADW OqLBX9sCzaAll//72mqZyPxv3VI036DSJuGm+gHfto/IdClYjh0SIdMhCoCSA61d HIGPZFnwSIy2aoml8zYLORGznEAuCjCywUVQpXO6nd+w+kp6xOkSBAE= =ms5Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--