From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id iLH1NFvG4mC2AAAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 10:44:11 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id UF+7MFvG4mCGbgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 08:44:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 093F514435 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2021 10:44:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34642 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m0KD2-0000hI-KH for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 04:44:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m0KCw-0000hA-AP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 04:44:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m0KCw-0008Am-36 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 04:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0KCw-00067I-2d for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 04:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#48064: texlive-* packages fail to build non-deterministically Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 08:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48064 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Thiago Jung Bauermann Received: via spool by 48064-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48064.162547458523418 (code B ref 48064); Mon, 05 Jul 2021 08:44:02 +0000 Received: (at 48064) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2021 08:43:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43881 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0KC1-00065e-B8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 04:43:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49094) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0KBz-00064j-5I for 48064@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 04:43:04 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m0KBt-0007Lw-FP; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 04:42:57 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=42644 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m0KBt-0004xn-65; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 04:42:57 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <871rav68km.fsf@inria.fr> <3617506.ZDHn73UUgp@popigai> Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 10:42:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3617506.ZDHn73UUgp@popigai> (Thiago Jung Bauermann's message of "Tue, 29 Jun 2021 16:59:48 -0300") Message-ID: <87k0m5w3qo.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 48064@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1625474651; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=z//BEPuvzM+XNpfBjeeuPuxHrFDACl7XYN+s3sFT3XY=; b=AYPb6VjkXnnMk8bzsR5Xy7BzSzkim4jTWu+pZWe+uLspKs1UipmlE1knYR2ZHc1EerB1X6 E2NggZNvrwcSbhGtriCY6+xz106ezSbKula36RW+jS5x4Pd9XsT0TjYh8L+qRpojoGYT76 ZGlRN9tVB5kK2y6oJq+yagE/2cLDdRuUw0sCG9/PmT1ovFJ9hH11ag+9RD8WridzmBrgN4 9lxdxRz5y3GX2PYnc076z0QhuBysNwWDE/JsMgLdIXr+r4sAoSWyJVQNGmHGp4Vk0+9nGB nGeQ2bedRM9ipMzfXDSefSfpyHSxLABoq8s9bW6H+vZ5tN9fVZAD6+aNa3L7nQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1625474651; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=GTwMJVnJzBVpTliWe3SLi8xwoIF5cw1i9Nk3e4osGGmRls2cBiYTvwfODLGrxGuFts9S7A iyadRY5tDZpGA6ZDYFdfBDnPrUWQxKX7LevqbfzX0ODhRtMvGizRNJ8JP38gvCRvuFR9wK 1kAcNOqOVHR1CGpdUl65k7/K+5cPyTqL2UsAylEE4/1e/qNoSl5+G4bXD9KFeQd4QpZdwe jh40cYWx6tk/f+8J1xDoT3yzEyu5AXA89OAjv/GuiA1ibBf+I3MWiZxVZIIsr1gNa7Vf1z khfVDp9/gTv7NaYfHkbvCJ99nt/FYU4kCjiI4IR+QO5ULww9WzIN51ALaeWjaw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.91 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 093F514435 X-Spam-Score: -2.91 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: Ry3Gv2QXeikc Hello! Thiago Jung Bauermann skribis: > I have bad news and good news. :-) > > Unfortunately, TeX Live 2021 still has this bug. I tested version 2021032= 5=20 > (which is the latest on the historic TeX Live FTP site), with subversion= =20 > tag texlive-2021.3 (which is the latest tag in the TeX Live repo). Bah. Still, if you have the whole texlive upgrade, we should apply it! > The good news is that I found a simple workaround: use pdftex instead of= =20 > luatex to build the affected packages. I am currently building all packag= es=20 > matching =E2=80=98^texlive=E2=80=99 a few times to find the ones needing = this workaround. > So far, I found these: > > =E2=80=A2 texlive-amsfonts > =E2=80=A2 texlive-amscls > =E2=80=A2 texlive-babel > =E2=80=A2 texlive-babel-swedish > =E2=80=A2 texlive-latex-amsmath > =E2=80=A2 texlive-generic-babel-english > =E2=80=A2 texlive-latex-cyrillic > =E2=80=A2 texlive-latex-graphics > =E2=80=A2 texlive-latex-tools We haven=E2=80=99t heard from dev-luatex yet. I think we should go with th= is workaround for now (those build failures are frequently preventing evaluations at from completing, which is a real bummer). Does using =E2=80=98pdftex=E2=80=99 r= ather than =E2=80=98luatex=E2=80=99 have an impact on the output of these packages? Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.