From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id uJnhHE1bs2EEbQEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:51:09 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id cBqoGE1bs2EvKAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:51:09 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37A7C309B9 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:51:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47334 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mvgIm-0000ZV-Dv for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:51:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mvgHx-0000Ya-Ry for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:50:19 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:43891) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mvgHv-00060y-St for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 08:50:17 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B5DA240101 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:50:12 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1639144212; bh=rB7zKI41v1ArvX2gZUAAJGTh7TA2IWYVTXq8NpXJWTo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=Ej/p4NFB/3XIE4m0kDQiRqWjk92YM2+gPNa0ZZUk0jPaOAZHkNibidhSTDp5mItXb 3nERs87ampvCDYSMONM30Enfrc6r1G1DxLht/kPOj3p8Mgaqj0ULyVW2666mvB7nlI Qq8J5P3X1XzxTsHz6G82ZCJdxE0WMa0q+GuuWancmpEVVMevsy8o0V7Qg9XFwGRFkJ KUhppLT02qLjtyQHe9BwaBao5qqnidnEAWBJl+gsl8H0RPVAUWREwO2xvLQ91c1meC 7w0qYt98Bnlri11JKHyEROUIqHbxV0J7uTXTc+RPtbyjXkKp14QJJcuKEa6P+pvofI XFWzu/oruaEwg== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4J9XN265z4z6tmL; Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:50:10 +0100 (CET) References: <87v900efyw.fsf@kitej> From: Guillaume Le Vaillant To: Foo Chuan Wei Subject: Re: cl-gsll fails to load Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 13:41:13 +0000 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87k0gch8ml.fsf@kitej> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=glv@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, cox.katherine.e@gmail.com Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1639144269; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=rB7zKI41v1ArvX2gZUAAJGTh7TA2IWYVTXq8NpXJWTo=; b=jsa1H8WMQ8YGFUeynpiV+TiRRf8NAUuhbh3Na8K85IQ/HSPjsyaPQxTijW/fI0DZx89ODB ZNskmHJ3Odx6h4E4J7OTTAAtjYxFQi24UveCbyOKm1I5CwHQk/Qa3EuUz6gUNEvxn66ixn Vf4lCzL3foT3g+gmKfU+dJXyueOH8brIK7c9SNYpZcKVa2pFm1qZO2bPROXEZabaMCaYQG Kpr0PeBs57eIsd6JwzY8ixrFJ8VXqWL4bnsm1nGKO8KCNALitxMr61c/eOvJFW5crH5yGZ hxEuyUkJTWflgJlJD/qmdboy15jUHoQt7AwHt8Hh+OKMqKGCcNPh5+9MHsgwaA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1639144269; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=VzVxzdjXFOOy2QuYzMPdWQeX8/lk05LFaNXyA86APJp1wBznyEbbVsB5ERcYMbufiFjYjh E/38zyixOQE2bJzQKTvF+2sBigYnu0SUTjhj5t2GizJrRpiO+31U6MLw6HWKj3MEoACUh+ 5QL56FdienutEe+SSga/tnseNiQkuOqybxLzFFepVCD3iafFRJSvNzNjdfn5ZIl2/7uV3P dyXA9mjmMgSHkmF9v9AyRxL1o59gvjvR4sRd/4J0RfbkB217Wm5bsTtkgpVMGyFNcT4GhD 8bmlehjKXtXUWqigKKOpmUE5+GsY4VbnghwCyt5Lr3+vKbTobomkHSXBwVFmUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="Ej/p4NFB"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.66 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b="Ej/p4NFB"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 37A7C309B9 X-Spam-Score: -3.66 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: g+JtXIAMF4DB --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Foo Chuan Wei skribis: > On 2021-12-07 12:27 +0000, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: >> I think the problem comes from the fact that the build system for >> cl-xxx packages doesn't use the custom phases added to some sbcl-xxx >> packages (like the 'fix-cffi-paths' phase of sbcl-gsll). Instead a fixed >> set of phases is used (see '%standard-phases/source' from >> "guix/build/asdf-build-system.scm", used in the >> 'sbcl-package->cl-source-package' function from >> "guix/build-system/asdf.scm"). > > Are you sure about this? From my observations, the cl-xxx packages do > use the custom phases added to the sbcl-xxx packages. When I install > cl-gsll and look into its store directory > (~/.guix-profile/share/common-lisp/source/cl-gsll/), I do see the > effect of sbcl-gsll's custom phase ("fix-cffi-paths"). Indeed, it looks like custom phases are taken into considerations now (I don't remember when this got fixed). However although cl-cffi has a custom phase to fix the path to gcc, it still tries to run "gcc" instead of "/gnu/store.../gcc" when compiling cl-gsll from a REPL. I'll try to find where this bare "gcc" comes from... --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCYbNbEg8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j9xeQD/XZ6Puf00ez44zSlU107wgwCHe7GpJldl8ew0 5qWnqE4A/jbyi0xGRgdzqnYbrOWQ4XfVMDpemG7t4hNLThMtrVxy =P/0b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--