From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id KGQnEEwxBGJdXAEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 22:25:32 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id 8MGaDUwxBGKtIAEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 22:25:32 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1A43398A3 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 22:25:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:53936 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHuSw-0008HJ-SA for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:25:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHuSV-0008Gg-70 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:25:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59076) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHuSU-0006f6-UK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:25:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHuSU-0005Cm-R2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:25:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#53865] [PATCH] gnu: ruby-parser: Update to 3.1.0.0. Resent-From: Nicolas Goaziou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 21:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53865 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 53865@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: jgart@dismail.de, 53865-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: jgart via Guix-patches via X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 53865@debbugs.gnu.org, jgart , 53865-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 53865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53865.164444185419921 (code B ref 53865); Wed, 09 Feb 2022 21:25:02 +0000 Received: (at 53865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2022 21:24:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52972 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHuRi-0005B9-Ib for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:24:14 -0500 Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:48471) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHuRg-0005AZ-NF; Wed, 09 Feb 2022 16:24:12 -0500 Received: (Authenticated sender: admin@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9B71FF805; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 21:24:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <20220208020834.5701-1-jgart@dismail.de> <874k58w04v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20220209130213.GB5766@gac.attlocal.net> <87o83fvmhn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <20220209160530.GB30067@gac.attlocal.net> <20220209161638.GD30067@gac.attlocal.net> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 22:24:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20220209161638.GD30067@gac.attlocal.net> (jgart via Guix-patches via's message of "Wed, 9 Feb 2022 16:16:38 -0500") Message-ID: <87k0e3vimj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1644441932; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=eCGC19a9gYe8Nq7LG0gWoplyHNctjLyUE+PdeVXBNas=; b=K8X9Xf2oHOxmHxQE2OYlDBxRb3w+0UBNJavCOLzZyJfh5FCikw7CFd6Vi51db+f6xw1NKm XKoRTsShBGUPNKoZMZ6L9hFhGPWNHT2LEkSlFIkrooD+6Y6F/ew4TB6po+lVumjYKG1dSw q7EK2BSCGOpEY1x6i59zFkPD1VoyP0F7sO4477B6EMc8poAILqf8yF0osqLBRLUHYQ6gCa eXGBGoFob4WLhB0NMRYpxxAxUISvDwwH/qNyeR6a/uS3VANFS8GDjwHXt9+u5ZRmSUPd+n oEVM6VyTkbr3W8shReumjAcdBAKO313GeRwMOMLeoBzlwjqtPZyHkkBqWDRpyg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1644441932; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=HgG9cGhee3e2gEImM4OtGnKb9OBlSgyKEHkrh+TS4dNdiD4ZO7IBslVfk6AJhmtSdqvdbc Z+hEP0E4SRhpy3x4acQGdgNzdfP5QS2jxu2PEXWIiWN8V+cVAjFVjiNfxF73pCAkHIqXUn CJsSw4TGz8nzWXVEjYGjCY3gLcJRRvln9Mk+BxvZWn1eVgXa0qMtM3f8zzK8g0T85nddYh ymSDEoVLG1KiT/q0XGSvh2TlYHd20ZzBQOMGRalH0ckolImWFmUl7f/6y8XTZUxv4OLp27 d8Yoxg0yo+Fzpp4tupwxDIURWXfctT94cKKcjAJMRD4ygH8NgTMqtNLt/XtZSw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.23 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E1A43398A3 X-Spam-Score: -3.23 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: 66L8gz8TO89Q jgart via Guix-patches via writes: > What do you think if we were to add a smart user message to the `guix refresh > --list-dependent ...` command? > > I was thinking something along these lines: > > ``` > $ guix refresh --list-dependent ruby-parser > > Building the following 1991 packages would ensure 5378 dependent packages are rebuilt: ... > > ruby-parser reported 5000+ packages. According to Submitting Patches section of > the manual, above 1800, it should go to core-updates (at the moment). > ``` > > Like that, the command reminds the user/calculates for the user what > branch to put the package in. > > I'm imagining it would be as easy as just getting the length of the output and > matching against it the appropriate message? This would only be useful for people wanting to submit a patch who have forgotten about that rule. For everyone else, this is just technical noise. I don't think this is something terribly useful. In any case, you can create another bug report to suggest it as an UI improvement. Regards,