From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id kBGoENTDSWQ41wAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 02:37:40 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id wKWOENTDSWT/1wAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 02:37:40 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD55029D05 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 02:37:39 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=systemreboot.net header.s=default header.b=Noz++BBs; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=systemreboot.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1682555860; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=sRRH6UpdA70mOUrjhh622fJVAwlKzhZPpXRq+B4zwr8=; b=jSNSqZUR8bXbhbmySxmgtRmB4OgRJvWGA3G0TzVhWdvtWXp9wGBh8rfKaWp/q+Kq7fIufG wY2jnphUbIwPj1xgcfgoq+EEipSyvEbBCOXYITzYvrOa21aQ/nBSvJdWwmTF+Bqwp4UI8U a7OQxaAEi5s7yhQTehcglqGa3aqgdQgGvmlGPugdJYm6h/CDNyYdxQWsD9EZmMmM7bDKBD bqDc1xqOLEyig9oe/zCYO57fJIw/hQJjRQh6uR7Rx3B/tRF0nEAxfrTy7tegq3J0NaGLfi a4aCg2WURSJd6tRhTwcTBfSfMVyjR21jcMekeJZJZEDdieObD7Ip0l05cLoSQA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=systemreboot.net header.s=default header.b=Noz++BBs; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=systemreboot.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1682555860; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=iks+W1GxDKHGBSwEh9ZO3bmbbaD+a1jlUx/c+kUtAvryWRWv6ugt7DvRHQrZTm/7iUHHaO ussuRWxLchj1ZMxphx/jwsWngcnJIl3oD2sfESkstdw8MOFYYD4slA1bFwa3qztSVVPh6e LZXt+hFMfRSp4Ky2yvYGkVzzkve+ZLdEJm5xD+PusnZspeCv/rLGQ97J0d29mNP7wCnRIp m1L4Her7aTEq5ikl4rygO/AWX8Yic3ju5+3JMIZ+rVo3udUaC2ZSBrZaZrrpnWMijPnm55 5L6GjLwl0dDLmLqyefF1NGhs8lRxRUKAgWDuGCVyfiesnntsWk916usmvYQSEw== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1prp1S-0002vs-KW; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 19:58:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1prp1R-0002vj-Ku for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 19:58:05 -0400 Received: from mugam.systemreboot.net ([139.59.75.54]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1prp1P-00059n-NT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 19:58:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=systemreboot.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date: References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=sRRH6UpdA70mOUrjhh622fJVAwlKzhZPpXRq+B4zwr8=; b=Noz++BBs20vq8hKDfuJTyf9rGt IhxaT8s/2gCZKgD9x2A7IyXZkCeTZDdvLIX3I/zUGkM9DwJL8JPwcGGGkF/lHYN62tFpdaa/SqSgS WVIAeRrclNd8MzqyhDFFbcyLR+8A/ZDZQJTCuJYdFiSsgL8e0ynxIWqSoamwI3MKM7pmTatE85Roe +Q4dO2/CPefwkKXdXyx/mvBFREq0BPmi/NbuGsDEYmqZEAfUHr8nV0aOKkKKAkYc03+7JMTITgDd5 3i0JUa9E2DJweuVDBENkP4+yQhRR1Q6TJDLe1XjbTtTnMUNElj15wCW38OigIEGWxsNedz/KcIunQ OsEQY4NQ==; Received: from [192.168.2.1] (port=47106 helo=localhost) by systemreboot.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1prp1G-0005Mv-39; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:57:55 +0100 From: Arun Isaac To: Josselin Poiret , guix-devel@gnu.org Cc: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: `mumi send-email' means no more debbugs dance to send multiple patches In-Reply-To: <87ttx4rkqb.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> References: <87mt2xiab3.fsf@systemreboot.net> <87leihujq7.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> <874jp4i1vu.fsf@systemreboot.net> <87ttx4rkqb.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 00:57:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87jzxygps4.fsf@systemreboot.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=139.59.75.54; envelope-from=arunisaac@systemreboot.net; helo=mugam.systemreboot.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: UNKNOWN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 6.14 X-Spam-Score: 6.14 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: BD55029D05 X-Migadu-Scanner: in3.migadu.com X-TUID: 2dQuusYq7nO3 Hi Josselin, > My mails usually take less that 30 seconds to get a reply from debbugs. > I don't remember how long it took yesterday for the issue to appear on > mumi though, but more than the 15 retries of mumi send-email (I manually > checked). Could you link to the specific email message that you tried sending with `mumi send-email'? Debbugs provides the complete email message in mbox format. The email headers should have timestamps we can look at to ascertain how long it took. I am hoping that this was a one-off spurious delay somewhere in the email system. I would certainly encourage you to try using `mumi send-email' again to see if the problem persists. If it does, we should certainly try and do something about it. Regards, Arun