From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id kFi9DvTo02UEUQEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:49:08 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id kFi9DvTo02UEUQEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:49:08 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1708386548; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=xQyx5y3whvqw+B7TGKpi90GViQG1UkjuVPD1MGp4jcw=; b=masGr5KSr7HSybKCdXIp/JKTYfP0Dbgs7Cn+ZMSn/9zUAauew72U/rraSRjPCrCcroCsEm nGJJ5Acdbm0TjZj7N/7Ys5OSCbsFo+ryx2jEGZ+1L0vF/tz2Z2Fe+0ZKxymfWyzmEGhXGc 6LMMIxsi7/iG6CEziaakK21YNp1P4yL1GF2im6TnYZ31xfE16vBNybYrZb8IMgBsBLlYW+ 04H3Arc0N6Fu9zhU1LWIkSbGIxOpjZlotTrMdFQHIS6QY1b6E16TK1MBCo6ANs3Y6DJTXz PoeqEtPA8/bY6n6Oe2BI7hPE0WnuIixfV+IHZoc6NbVsKbsVRDLrqOBxXnIkbA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1708386548; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=gOH7GIeRGMIjZaQIePZl3lNMNxO2w0ptPIObJM0b6cW7CY88P/TiBGfNPkPwJkdTj4s9Da QXJWOKjhYwW9VVWg2vUbpJTTuzuGMIyMouN3L6xi4Exh5ux74ITkv4+i/QxUVlgqBxk9hc wF0WfKZ9mtrgAoLmASm2U9hGMgy4JNfpxE8WYhxmqbBKchgZsjoDFjM26tYBU8HgC9V1Iv EhPciJOHNXR9nV9KY05TLTyVas6AtRG/Pz7EQotkm8NdVN2FUU2qHxJfJyHcfPMDFBDseZ kaH8goL71eDlgsWf+LuB9EkSj4iwsSveZZ7g3oBiyQERwdUe22LJ4GLvCTtFaQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E87046D4CC for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:49:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcDNN-0005Ht-Tk; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:48:46 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcDNK-0005HL-Ca for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:48:43 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcDNI-0003Xn-Vi for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:48:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rcDNe-0000dC-9n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:49:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#65335] [PATCH 0/4] Allow mounting root on tmpfs for impersistence Resent-From: Nicolas Graves Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 23:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65335 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: paren@disroot.org, 65335-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 65335-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D65335.17083865012354 (code D ref 65335); Mon, 19 Feb 2024 23:49:02 +0000 Received: (at 65335-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Feb 2024 23:48:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43767 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rcDMz-0000bu-0R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:48:21 -0500 Received: from 15.mo550.mail-out.ovh.net ([188.165.38.232]:43489) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rcDMw-0000bj-OS for 65335-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:48:19 -0500 Received: from director5.ghost.mail-out.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.2.141]) by mo550.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Tdzk40Clkz1GjR for <65335-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 23:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ghost-submission-6684bf9d7b-ctdvj (unknown [10.110.178.72]) by director5.ghost.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 100911FD3D; Mon, 19 Feb 2024 23:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ngraves.fr ([37.59.142.95]) by ghost-submission-6684bf9d7b-ctdvj with ESMTPSA id YrfKAqTo02U+FQYAUYi6wA (envelope-from ); Mon, 19 Feb 2024 23:47:48 +0000 X-OVh-ClientIp: 81.67.146.208 In-Reply-To: <87il2kqr9j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <108a67c0ef10e00162d81bcf7bc6243d6895c49b.1692569807.git.ngraves@ngraves.fr> <875y58a3ii.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87edj7zkqw.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87edi96ww6.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <877co1p2f9.fsf@ngraves.fr> <87lec8pbwn.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmr6vtm8.fsf@ngraves.fr> <87il2kqr9j.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:47:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87jzn0j9ss.fsf@ngraves.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 16763523715076710918 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrvdelgddufecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfggtgfgsehtqhertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefpihgtohhlrghsucfirhgrvhgvshcuoehnghhrrghvvghssehnghhrrghvvghsrdhfrheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffduleekjeevteelueffjeefffethffhffeutdettefhleeuleevffejvdfftdffnecukfhppeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdekuddrieejrddugeeirddvtdekpdefjedrheelrddugedvrdelheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepnhhgrhgrvhgvshesnhhgrhgrvhgvshdrfhhrpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtohepieehfeefhedqughonhgvseguvggssghughhsrdhgnhhurdhorhhgpdfovfetjfhoshhtpehmohehhedtpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuth X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Nicolas Graves X-ACL-Warn: , Nicolas Graves via Guix-patches From: Nicolas Graves via Guix-patches via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.61 X-Spam-Score: -3.61 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E87046D4CC X-TUID: iSol8UnmrVXE On 2024-02-19 18:48, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > Nicolas Graves skribis: > >> Just to tell that the v3 I sent a few weeks ago is indeed fully tested, >> and that commit messages are properly written. > > Just pushed v3 as b1ec85533a63c10616d9260f90411ca6f362de00! > > I did tweak the commit messages but that=E2=80=99s because I=E2=80=99m to= o picky :-) and > the changes were minor. > >> Should we also think about a blog post on impermanence like nix did? > > Yes, definitely! > > There could also be a section in the manual with a complete OS > definition, to show how one can set up a volatile image. On my todo list, though my priority right now is node-build-system to try and package zotero properly. > > Last, I realize there=E2=80=99s no system tests. I=E2=80=99m not sure ho= w to do that > (because system tests already run on a tmpfs overlay) but it=E2=80=99d be= nice > to make sure =E2=80=9Croot=3Dnone=E2=80=9D handling keeps working. > > Thoughts? I don't have a better view on this than you have. Basically I mostly test it directly since for most changes I can always roll-back. Indeed here it doesn't seem straightforward to check it fully, we can still test the function bootable-kernel-arguments, but it's not that useful. > > Thanks for all the work! > > Ludo=E2=80=99. --=20 Best regards, Nicolas Graves