From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= <iyzsong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add vte.
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:34:30 +0800
Message-ID: <87iohbkeux.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <1418535265-17233-1-git-send-email-iyzsong@gmail.com>
	<874msyfhob.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<87bnn5mbkz.fsf@gmail.com> <87d27k2c59.fsf@yeeloong.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60952)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <iyzsong@gmail.com>) id 1Y0qRr-0007OU-Dw
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:37:56 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <iyzsong@gmail.com>) id 1Y0qOh-0000fK-Sy
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:34:44 -0500
Received: from mail-pd0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::236]:45267)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <iyzsong@gmail.com>) id 1Y0qOh-0000f8-Lg
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 06:34:35 -0500
Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id p10so13790572pdj.27
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 03:34:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87d27k2c59.fsf@yeeloong.lan>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:

> =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 <iyzsong@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> David Thompson <dthompson2@worcester.edu> writes:
>>> Maybe call this one 'vte-gtk2'?  'vte-0' isn't very descriptive.
>> Basically, I intend to use the version of pc file,
>> for example, I have libwnck-1, which has libwnck-1.0.pc.
>>
>> Yes, this does make sense, but 'vte-gtk2' is look like another package,
>> how about 'vte/gtk+-2'?
>
> Package names cannot match the regexp "-[0-9]", because when
> 'package-name->name+version' in (guix utils) finds such a match, it
> interprets the part after the "-" as a version number.  So if you run
> "guix package -i vte/gtk+-2", it will look for version "2" of a package
> named "vte/gtk+".
Ah, I think you mean the 'name' field of package?

I'm talk about the variable name, for which we have gtk+-2, gtkmm-2 etc.
>
>      Mark