From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Upgrade bedtools to 0.25.0.
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 19:07:42 +0100
Message-ID: <87io324oep.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <5690ACF3.7010206@uq.edu.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60125)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aHxvg-0005fw-NG
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 13:07:57 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aHxvc-0007Ah-NJ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 13:07:56 -0500
Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:25633)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aHxvc-0007AS-Df
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2016 13:07:52 -0500
In-reply-to: <5690ACF3.7010206@uq.edu.au>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au>
Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" <guix-devel@gnu.org>


Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au> writes:

> A reasonably straightforward update.

I think you forgot to also remove the “bedtools-32bit-compilation.patch”
file from “gnu/packages/patches”.

Otherwise I agree with Andreas about separating the stylistic from the
functional changes by doing two commits.

Thanks!

~~ Ricardo