From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Python2-jsonschema fails Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:00:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87io2qdjvi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160118101556.GA4977@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> <569CE0B4.5010307@gmail.com> <20160118164127.56e5b075@debian-netbook> <569CFC51.2000903@gmail.com> <20160118150334.GA9800@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> <20160118224600.GA5918@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLS9I-0001od-3o for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 04:00:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLS9E-0007Ta-PK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 04:00:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160118224600.GA5918@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 18 Jan 2016 17:46:00 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 04:03:34PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 03:53:05PM +0100, Cyril Roelandt wrote: >> > Yes, a bunch of packages will have to be rebuilt, but there is nothing >> > we can do about this, I'm afraid. >>=20 >> I think what Efraim meant was that package-with-python2 does not work wh= en >> dealing with packages depending on python2-jsonschema. They will then not >> depend on python2-jsonschema (built with python2-functools32), but on the >> recursively rewritten (package-with-python2 python-jsonschema), which do= es >> not include python2-functools32 in its inputs. We already have this rath= er >> unpleasant problem around the numpy/matplotlib universe. > > Shall we open a bug for this? It was discussed in #22013 [0] but that > specific issue was solved and the bug was closed in expectation of a > more general bug report. Yes, please open a bug report for the more general issue. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.