Python2-jsonschema fails

Python2-jsonschema fails

[Andreas Enge]

Hello,

on commit c3e919d in master, python2-jsonschema fails compilation:
   http://hydra.gnu.org/build/945743
This is probably due to the update in commit b3667af.

The build log shows that it is trying to download packages from pypi,
namely functools32. Maybe there is an input to be added?

It would be nice if someone more knowledgeable could have a look.

Thanks,

Andreas

Re: Python2-jsonschema fails

[Cyril Roelandt]

On 01/18/2016 11:15 AM, Andreas Enge wrote:
> The build log shows that it is trying to download packages from pypi,
> namely functools32. Maybe there is an input to be added?

Yes, but functools32 should only be added to the inputs of
python2-jsonchema, since it is a backport of a Python 3 library.

Cyril.

Re: Python2-jsonschema fails

[Efraim Flashner]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 707 bytes --]

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:55:16 +0100
Cyril Roelandt <tipecaml@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 01/18/2016 11:15 AM, Andreas Enge wrote:
> > The build log shows that it is trying to download packages from pypi,
> > namely functools32. Maybe there is an input to be added?  
> 
> Yes, but functools32 should only be added to the inputs of
> python2-jsonchema, since it is a backport of a Python 3 library.
> 
> Cyril.
> 

Yes but it has a cascading effect through python.scm and openstack.scm

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Python2-jsonschema fails

[Cyril Roelandt]

On 01/18/2016 03:41 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> 
> Yes but it has a cascading effect through python.scm and openstack.scm
> 

Yes, a bunch of packages will have to be rebuilt, but there is nothing
we can do about this, I'm afraid.

Cyril.

Re: Python2-jsonschema fails

[Andreas Enge]

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 03:53:05PM +0100, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
> Yes, a bunch of packages will have to be rebuilt, but there is nothing
> we can do about this, I'm afraid.

I think what Efraim meant was that package-with-python2 does not work when
dealing with packages depending on python2-jsonschema. They will then not
depend on python2-jsonschema (built with python2-functools32), but on the
recursively rewritten (package-with-python2 python-jsonschema), which does
not include python2-functools32 in its inputs. We already have this rather
unpleasant problem around the numpy/matplotlib universe.

A cheating workaround would be to also add python-functools32 to the inputs
of python-jsonschema, assuming that it would be superfluous, but not
impossible, that is, not creating a conflict.

Andreas

Re: Python2-jsonschema fails

[Efraim Flashner]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 814 bytes --]

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 11:15:56 +0100
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> on commit c3e919d in master, python2-jsonschema fails compilation:
>    http://hydra.gnu.org/build/945743
> This is probably due to the update in commit b3667af.
> 
> The build log shows that it is trying to download packages from pypi,
> namely functools32. Maybe there is an input to be added?
> 
> It would be nice if someone more knowledgeable could have a look.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas
> 

This should be fixed in commit 264ae68.

Separately, python2-tempest-lib's tests are failing.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Python2-jsonschema fails

[Leo Famulari]

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 04:03:34PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 03:53:05PM +0100, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
> > Yes, a bunch of packages will have to be rebuilt, but there is nothing
> > we can do about this, I'm afraid.
> 
> I think what Efraim meant was that package-with-python2 does not work when
> dealing with packages depending on python2-jsonschema. They will then not
> depend on python2-jsonschema (built with python2-functools32), but on the
> recursively rewritten (package-with-python2 python-jsonschema), which does
> not include python2-functools32 in its inputs. We already have this rather
> unpleasant problem around the numpy/matplotlib universe.

Shall we open a bug for this? It was discussed in #22013 [0] but that
specific issue was solved and the bug was closed in expectation of a
more general bug report.

> 
> A cheating workaround would be to also add python-functools32 to the inputs
> of python-jsonschema, assuming that it would be superfluous, but not
> impossible, that is, not creating a conflict.

This "solution" is already in place throughout python.scm. I don't think
that python-setuptools is really required for many of the python-3
packages that call it as a native-input, but it eases the python-2
translation.

[0]
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22013

> 
> Andreas
> 
> 

Re: Python2-jsonschema fails

[Andreas Enge]

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 05:46:00PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Shall we open a bug for this? It was discussed in #22013 [0] but that
> specific issue was solved and the bug was closed in expectation of a
> more general bug report.

I think it would be helpful to not forget the problem.

Andreas

Re: Python2-jsonschema fails

[Ludovic Courtès]

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 04:03:34PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 03:53:05PM +0100, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
>> > Yes, a bunch of packages will have to be rebuilt, but there is nothing
>> > we can do about this, I'm afraid.
>> 
>> I think what Efraim meant was that package-with-python2 does not work when
>> dealing with packages depending on python2-jsonschema. They will then not
>> depend on python2-jsonschema (built with python2-functools32), but on the
>> recursively rewritten (package-with-python2 python-jsonschema), which does
>> not include python2-functools32 in its inputs. We already have this rather
>> unpleasant problem around the numpy/matplotlib universe.
>
> Shall we open a bug for this? It was discussed in #22013 [0] but that
> specific issue was solved and the bug was closed in expectation of a
> more general bug report.

Yes, please open a bug report for the more general issue.

Thanks,
Ludo’.