From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: font-dejavu: Update to 2.35. Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 11:47:18 +0300 Message-ID: <87io0s13s9.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87r3fhnx7y.fsf@gmail.com> <20160311145653.696d6733@debian-netbook> <874mcdysou.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36176) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aefCX-0008UD-9F for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 03:47:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aefCS-00066e-9y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 03:47:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <874mcdysou.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:50:41 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2016-03-11 17:50 +0300) wrote: > Efraim Flashner skribis: > >> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:08:17 +0300 >> Alex Kost wrote: >> >>> I was going to commit several updates including font-dejavu. Happily, >>> with: >>> >>> guix refresh -l font-dejavu >>> >>> I found that many things would be rebuilt (including some big ones like >>> abiword, libreoffice, gimp, gnome). This happens because 'font-dejavu' >>> is an input of 'cups-filters' which is an input of 'cups' which is an >>> input for several things including 'gtk+'. >>> >>> So my question is: should this update go to master? >> >> Some of these I push to core-updates. Rebuilding check means rebuilding = 188 >> packages so I pushed it to core-updates. Currently hydra is building out >> security updates to take out some of the grafts so not "distracting" hyd= ra >> with large rebuilds is good(tm). > > +1 Sorry, I didn't get it. Should this update be pushed to core-updates? But not now? --=20 Alex