From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: font-dejavu: Update to 2.35. Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:27:59 -0500 Message-ID: <87io0r9f3k.fsf@netris.org> References: <87r3fhnx7y.fsf@gmail.com> <20160311145653.696d6733@debian-netbook> <874mcdysou.fsf@gnu.org> <87io0s13s9.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45657) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aexdm-0003Ao-3M for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:28:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aexdi-0008UT-Me for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 23:28:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87io0s13s9.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Sat, 12 Mar 2016 11:47:18 +0300") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost writes: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2016-03-11 17:50 +0300) wrote: > >> Efraim Flashner skribis: >> >>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:08:17 +0300 >>> Alex Kost wrote: >>> >>>> I was going to commit several updates including font-dejavu. Happily, >>>> with: >>>> >>>> guix refresh -l font-dejavu >>>> >>>> I found that many things would be rebuilt (including some big ones like >>>> abiword, libreoffice, gimp, gnome). This happens because 'font-dejavu' >>>> is an input of 'cups-filters' which is an input of 'cups' which is an >>>> input for several things including 'gtk+'. >>>> >>>> So my question is: should this update go to master? >>> >>> Some of these I push to core-updates. Rebuilding check means rebuilding= 188 >>> packages so I pushed it to core-updates. Currently hydra is building out >>> security updates to take out some of the grafts so not "distracting" hy= dra >>> with large rebuilds is good(tm). >> >> +1 > > Sorry, I didn't get it. Should this update be pushed to core-updates? > But not now? I think you should push the update to core-updates at your earliest convenience :) Mark