From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: [PATCH] python-kivy and Adobe source-code-pro font Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:05:03 -0400 Message-ID: <87inv8uygw.fsf@netris.org> References: <20160805193516.18edfdd9@openmailbox.org> <87ziokv51w.fsf@netris.org> <1470859724.1107266.691760609.0426E3A3@webmail.messagingengine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47395) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXagj-00014e-67 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:05:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXage-0002QZ-VX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:05:20 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:42613) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXage-0002QQ-Ri for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:05:16 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1470859724.1107266.691760609.0426E3A3@webmail.messagingengine.com> (Alex Griffin's message of "Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:08:44 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Griffin Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Griffin writes: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016, at 01:42 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> That said, this needn't be a blocker for including the built OTF files >> in Guix, as long as the license permits all users to copy and >> redistribute them for commercial and non-commercial purposes, as these >> fonts are considered non-functional data. See: >>=20 >> http://www.gnu.org/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html#no= n-functional-data > > Are you sure about that? By my reading, that document explicitly > categorizes fonts as functional works by that document: > >> =E2=80=9CInformation for practical use=E2=80=9D includes software, docum= entation, fonts, >> and other data that has direct functional applications. It does not incl= ude >> artistic works that have an aesthetic (rather than functional) purpose, >> or statements of opinion or judgment. You're right, I stand corrected. This will require more investigation. Thanks, Mark