From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com>
Subject: bug#22115:
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:37:55 +0000
Message-ID: <87inthjlak.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
References: <CACA+5f0aMSrSirXgopDSa2QQ02-mrO857=a5E3yvReQpuQ+RZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87r385jnh7.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44199)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bowLS-00078d-Q0
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:39:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bowLO-0002Fk-L9
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:39:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59391)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bowLO-0002FI-Hy
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:39:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1bowLO-0000kM-8C
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:39:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.22115.B22115.14749979012820@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87r385jnh7.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: 22115@debbugs.gnu.org

ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Firefox 47.0.1, windows 7: no broken css.
>
> Is this enough to close this bug?

Otherwise I'd say we need more input on how this specific firefox
renders the page, the implemented css support, the proof that the person
who reported this bug has experienced this bug with no added
addons/extensions, etc (basically: is is reproducible, and if yes, how?
... that's why I want (in the future) what Gentoo is doing for
Chrom(e/ium) / Firefox based browsers, a global extensions store.. And
to eliminate the need to contact mozilla/google cdn servers about
addons, and some more reasons).
-- 
              ng0