From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Anyone working on encrypted root? Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 11:36:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87int8bglj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20161001222209.GA23037@khaalida> <87fuof9f2n.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20161002174135.GA10029@khaalida> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47394) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brM9n-0001e9-MD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 05:37:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brM9i-0007IJ-Is for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 05:37:02 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brM9i-0007Hz-FO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 05:36:58 -0400 Received: from pluto.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.57]:46534 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1brM9h-0004Zd-HG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 05:36:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20161002174135.GA10029@khaalida> (dian cecht's message of "Sun, 2 Oct 2016 10:41:35 -0700") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org dian_cecht@zoho.com skribis: > On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 11:16:00AM +0000, ng0 wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> As far as I know Jookia was working on it at some point but current >> workflow got them frustrated. >>=20 >> If you search around the archives of guix-devel you'll find this thread: >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-03/msg00396.html >> I fail to find the git... I'll ask Jookia and if you haven't found it >> yourself, I'll add it to this thread. >>=20 >> Thanks for picking up the work. > > I make no promises. I've already tried to sort out the init code and had = to > stop, but if I can get some help I might be able to figure something out.= Again, > no promises. See for the work-in-progress in this area. There=E2=80=99s even a patch awaiting testing. TIA, Ludo=E2=80=99.