From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update e-mail address for ng0. Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:03:43 +0000 Message-ID: <87int0s0ts.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> References: <20161010122844.12065-1-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20161010122844.12065-2-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87d1j88jx4.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87twckp83f.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btc8R-0003ZP-P5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 11:05:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btc8N-0005ET-7O for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 11:04:59 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:60630) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btc8N-0005EE-0S for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 11:04:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87twckp83f.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost writes: > ng0 (2016-10-10 12:31 +0000) wrote: > >> ng0 writes: >> >>> * .mailmap: Update entries for ng0. >>> --- >>> .mailmap | 8 ++++---- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap >>> index 4f756ec..85f5021 100644 >>> --- a/.mailmap >>> +++ b/.mailmap >>> @@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ Ludovic Courtès >>> Mathieu Lirzin >>> Mathieu Lirzin >>> Nikita Karetnikov >>> -ng0 >>> -ng0 >>> -ng0 >>> -ng0 >>> +ng0 >>> +ng0 >>> +ng0 >>> +ng0 >>> Pjotr Prins >>> Pjotr Prins >>> Raimon Grau >>> -- >>> 2.10.1 >>> >>> >> >> Additional question: is this incomplete? Do I have to add >> ng0 >> to this list aswell? > > You can check with "git --no-pager shortlog -nse". I'm not sure I > follow the changes with your emails, but if you are satisfied with the > output of that shortlog command after this patch, I will gladly apply > it, thanks. > > -- > Alex > Okay, I've just checked it and no old names / emails are displayed on their own. Works for me. Thanks