From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adonay Felipe Nogueira Subject: Re: artanis ? Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:17:23 -0300 Message-ID: <87inntcf18.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43062) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj48x-0005ib-RZ for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:18:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj48t-00010D-TU for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:18:11 -0500 Received: from lb1.openmailbox.org ([5.79.108.160]:46636 helo=mail.openmailbox.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj48t-0000yE-LU for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:18:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: (catonano@gmail.com's message of "Wed, 1 Mar 2017 03:23:28 +0100") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: help-guix@gnu.org I also got the same problem, but I don't know how to solve it yet. The following issues seem to be related: - [[http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/artanis/2016-05/msg00001.html]] - [[http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2016-02/msg00025.html]] However, I don't exactly know how to fix this, both because I'm not a Scheme programmer, and also because I'm not a programmer at all. There is one ugly workaround though: Make sure that the shell variables $GUILE_LOAD_PATH and $GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH have the Guile paths from your current Guix profile included, it should be something like this: GUILE_LOAD_PATH="$GUIX_PROFILE/share/guile/site:${GUILE_LOAD_PATH:+:}$GUILE_LOAD_PATH" Try to see if "$GUIX_PROFILE/share/guile/site" exists and has Artanis inside, if not try the following ones (do not point to Artanis directly): - "$GUIX_PROFILE/share/guile/2.0/site" - "$GUIX_PROFILE/share/guile/site/2.0" However, as I said earliear, this doesn't seem to be a fix, it's more like a workaround, since (as far as the previous references point to), it's the Artanis project's code that has to be fixed.