From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60118) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dF2Da-0002dh-5a for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2017 13:43:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dF2DW-0000GM-7f for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2017 13:43:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dF2DV-0000Fi-SG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2017 13:43:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dF2DV-0003oL-L5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2017 13:43:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26737: Making sure that comments can be made Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <874lw6drbc.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <20170501172040.12350-1-kei@openmailbox.org> <874lw6drbc.fsf@openmailbox.org> Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 19:42:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87inkkg9ns.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Kei Kebreau , 26737@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kei Kebreau writes: > Can I commit this (note: I will enable the release build, which > optimizes for size)? And for games with both ncurses and SDL tiles > interfaces, should the two interfaces be separate outputs or separate > packages all together? Since there has been no feedback for a month, I think you can go ahead and commit it (see HACKING). I do find the s// substitution a bit odd. Is there an upstream issue about it? I think we should do that in a phase instead, since it's apparently not a problem with other compilers(?). Different outputs is generally better than separate packages, but I guess it depends on the case. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlkrDBcACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPp2tAf+JL+8YfXSbr2xsEt/cdUJnM49ROeYGebtKvs0PnQ1M4NQFXTQMJcdxQ5n oPlBTWu4xKALfYYe9lCjRKf7ES4CuhXtV489I+0HetrGxXCvcJyJeAlM7AgFbTv4 kA8tB6LfyBMpi1toJyDxmgd54pWQPgrS+UVPM6h3/ya6O2byDzsg3llIheI/cZII lUmFcQ1UBPDl651P0CdxpZPSuSF5N0ZjNcbgWBQu67dVJP2kOZcUVJHkA/Fm0jRH v45+9jPZuoVfGRN7hZgEdRjOsgy4i/F+kqt6iq9FhOsdKcOjDirDR2/v2cvLzKG0 j8f7RfNbLTWjYp0hYfh2ckwQmVK6Gw== =TVtN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--