From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40538) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqPwZ-0002SA-Bx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 16:32:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqPwY-0006p4-Fr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 16:32:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dqPwY-0006nc-Bw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 16:32:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dqPwY-00039R-0Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2017 16:32:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28045] [PATCH] gnu: Add openfoam Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <513001199.42346965.1504884898846.JavaMail.root@centurylink.net> Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 22:30:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <513001199.42346965.1504884898846.JavaMail.root@centurylink.net> (Eric Bavier's message of "Fri, 8 Sep 2017 11:34:58 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <87ingt9blp.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Eric Bavier Cc: 28045@debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Garlick Hi Eric, Eric Bavier skribis: > It seems to me that if using Guix's profiles and environments, we could e= ntirely do without OpenFOAM's installation directories and simply install i= nto a standard bin/lib structure. Just install libraries into (string-appe= nd %output "/lib") and the binaries into (string-append %output "/bin"). Fair enough. I guess the question is more whether (1) this would work :-), and (2) whether seasoned OpenFOAM users would be happy with this. WDYT, Paul? Ludo=E2=80=99.