From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: M-x guix-system-generations vs. UUIDs
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 11:43:32 +0300
Message-ID: <87infudlxn.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87infv9xhd.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49094)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1e01ks-0001qp-9K
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 04:43:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alezost@gmail.com>) id 1e01km-0003jv-BD
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 04:43:42 -0400
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2017-10-04 09:35 +0200) wrote:

> Howdy Alex,
>
> I just noticed that =E2=80=98M-x guix-system-generations=E2=80=99 followe=
d by =E2=80=98i=E2=80=99
> doesn=E2=80=99t correctly handle UUID objects in the =E2=80=98root-device=
=E2=80=99 or
> =E2=80=98store-device=E2=80=99 fields.  Here=E2=80=99s the backtrace:
[...]
> I wonder if this was already the case before the introduction of <uuid>
> objects in commit 9b336338cdc0e46a3bf7a2913c2f61cd2410c4d6, when UUIDs
> were referred to as bytevectors.

I don't know (I've never used UUIDs), apparently UUIDs have never been
handled properly :-)

Should be fixed now (I mean should be fixed in the next release):

  https://notabug.org/alezost/emacs-guix/commit/6927d5afd2c4543bc97785d3f35=
e06a8b0fe86f3

Thank you for reporting!

--=20
Alex