From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49797) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKvxP-0006Ua-1Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 19:47:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKvxO-0006Ra-8B for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 19:47:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKvxO-0006RR-4f for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 19:47:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKvxN-0003On-PJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 19:47:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#29480] [PATCH] gnu: Add xautolock. Resent-Message-ID: From: Mike Gerwitz In-Reply-To: <87y3mn3jec.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:56:11 +0100") Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2017 19:44:27 -0500 Message-ID: <87indq0xhw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zi7786b0.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3mn3jec.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 29480-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 15:56:11 +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > I took the liberty to make the changes below: Ah, thanks! > diff --git a/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm b/gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm > - (zero? (system* "xmkmf")) > + (invoke "xmkmf") Okay, that makes much more sense. I was wondering if `zero?' had some special meaning in that context. gnu/packages/xfig.scm:93 uses it in a non-tail position as well. I looked at the history for the file but it was always like that; perhaps that should be `invoke' too? =2D-=20 Mike Gerwitz Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer GPG: D6E9 B930 028A 6C38 F43B 2388 FEF6 3574 5E6F 6D05 https://mikegerwitz.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJaIfdrAAoJEIyRe39dxRuiv6MP/3DfXKsPuIhc8qm80T7qSgdi Ymrx2dB/7NTwCSxleVik6sjT1mgntN07VFJQYrMtp9KqbC4PrBzcb+8dRy2cnI0U 1FtQwMKwowK8ymb6ElzBnNeHQNqOr53go1t9vKDm/znA13sFVZC2+nn/jScDHZQG 9ISsbDTlB9jQQrl8P8oNqINdnQ0Ymv2TnjJlbwcjJ9dO1aQ6qNuqPnMRVxng02um mF9bYdkRIErI+Y6T1X0zeEx20hy8BoT85gL/xRVRojLre4YG626ml6g85h0H7R3X Ax8VIJqbTJEIkHoNX9LB1TVAeOhw0JAROPOx61MFrnBLri9T+y5BD39lfCswdFJ+ H/IkWIwstXnXwjtyoX5cyyymCE/Mq+f03rXy7JVsxw8B8pULXUZgms3Bwc8OmqS7 qxrn3IHYck1p4nJUjKm6DN+LUQxqO9LqyZr6M8vvwYEr8FuMVXOzZu67IISvRhRZ VM8gaNmGsUCdD8JqbkRD2DH1leWaiW3260GRDgEVY7AbRD0Dg15y8k+bYk/WJyfF bGMRYslSrcFsnOVlpbADTq/7pP7IBictshdtximzKrz4kMtSR6ht9FC4G6a5rW4Z yuisYi4/zW8cIZaUghO3T5jByahtrTBDtGDwuYxLv8TIGPRe4e3qmpBcIAhV09v8 zQeJj12hBtYFeOOCei/o =SM9L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--