From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: bug#30097: [core-updates] nspr 4.17 not reproducible Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:20:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87inc1ai7g.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <87fu78e1lh.fsf@fastmail.com> <87a7xgdxs9.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35605) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebTz2-0003j9-Ct for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 11:21:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebTyw-0004jv-HG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 11:21:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ebTyw-0004jl-9B for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 11:21:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ebTyw-0003mr-3X for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 11:21:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Cc: 30097-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: > 2018-01-14 20:51 GMT+01:00 Marius Bakke : > >> G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: >> >> > 2018-01-14 19:28 GMT+01:00 Marius Bakke : >> > >> >> G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: >> >> >> >> > nspr 4.17 is not reproducible. >> >> > Diffoscope output attached. >> >> >> >> Thanks for the report! >> >> >> >> The attached patch should solve it. Since there are quite a few >> >> dependent packages, I'd like to push this to a new 'staging' branch t= hat >> >> will be started shortly after the core-updates merge. WDYT? >> >> >> >> Yes, it should go to a branch. >> > >> > I also don't know if this fixes the difference also, where an addition= al >> ; >> > is present... >> > Could you check this, or should I run a test with the patch? >> > It seems like a 2 byte difference. >> >> It passes `guix build --rounds=3D2`, so I'm not sure what was up with th= at >> ";". >> > > Most probably it is some kind of checksum which includes the timestamp. > If it passes "guix build --rounds=3D2" it should be fine. > Thanks for the clarification. I pushed this to a new 'staging' branch based off core-updates. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlpeJlMACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPp9vgf/S3Rc3oZjs9YmBERiArzMxVrzfosBuokK7xIg2VAyRT3KJzEqAZJ5ELLH YyrJj18UKAZI4tkex29qHyG/mTEQcd47L+9WsO88t/0g4Y8gRF77/JP1kxGRdGVr XA4aY70q47Miyf80sxITg4NRYSBsrHNDpi8bOxJYM0Fp702p/fVBvAO9CCnjVX4I ep1hP+ULg2Z5WizhGZshhJkf4ccdCc0XnNO/kmKpQzgQEBk+V8sst574b1R3gs7i ejxDuvjzWRbrwKioqp2GMMpitOISzgBQeL6aQkAd8k+02+eintHRwugbWmsOYy+4 zLKlGLYYJrQ5MwP8YaqBjX7YhcsLHA== =6J2q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--