From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Baines Subject: Ruby 2.5, pushing to staging? Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 23:59:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87in2g0zlm.fsf@cbaines.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50466) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g8ZBC-0001Gr-AG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 19:06:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g8Z48-00066K-S4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 18:59:28 -0400 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:fe69:8da9]:45230) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g8Z48-00065v-Ln for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 18:59:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (cpc102582-walt20-2-0-cust14.13-2.cable.virginm.net [86.27.34.15]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1947D1662C for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 23:59:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from capella (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f9d98ec6 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 22:59:21 +0000 (UTC) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hey, A new minor version of Ruby has been out for a while, and it would be good to get Ruby 2.5 in to Guix. I've put up a patch here [1], and tried it locally. I've pushed some fixes to master to make some packages compatible [2], and while I do get some failures when building the 958 (according to guix refresh -l) dependant packages, I'm unsure how many of these are down to the Ruby upgrade. 1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32871 2: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=32870 Anyway, looking at the contributing guide this is possibly too big of a change to push directly to master, so should I push this to the staging branch? Thanks, Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAlu37MVfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XcWHA//b8FDikmLZdaV88xalZuir7CC5BldCCTxbbLqtt2D57EjPozRZuVWjbgW MYwTnty0eZWFi1hzBN0pv1Q6ZDoEelBT1hJ1caf8IMx+cYUBGSspSu4bLusQNk+p ZhgTr6wrE+Zby6Yt6u9aC0h5e1qkA90QKt0LEdEcFNQJjZP3+IDjTsbRvf0yrsyU 3Owc4/KZiNSSM09pIpnKP8d2/aOBUjdSFBC+iZhjlP13gU0HCbYY5dN/jAJMqfWG JA+WqPL6CMe5gTeECD1DyxXLlqZsQGEHiI56JTvPKf8X5g834PzyvxClHs+hKx0u wjhbxyr85cSL3S3d3TlEQ+TTGXUbxjnxgfZ7e04Cmi24J2JQ7Nx61CDY81qQJQvB /ReWd6ApyFjP8PsJLgz4cSjnWmTABGol37Ss7iLsPt1X+JKLBwxGBlL0Ds4My8u+ 7O5LeoAkDjUxj3OQXbhkz3PYzAQUWdsbbQ3XqxKTUiFYBK2OwrGAoKsxWQD9lca7 Ss9HvuNfc31F7omfTRSotQK+8UNBAOLrdpAvT7DBtVLOKbKFYmbIQyN8LQsWVXX4 U5G9oFsuJBWVaZQqymUaP9jso4pNarjFaxLKDlSMSGZN/MuAZLTfGoYj/2OYvuCu MCnXHYXMIznE2V6NuYD68FyDcXQKADORlT+AcaVoKrDmQSuHTrg= =zVxp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--