From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: Come back and graphical installer Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:48:41 +0900 Message-ID: <87in1tfhly.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87lg6sejwa.fsf@gmail.com> <20181022170731.13db3f3b@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gEngd-0005pG-Rq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:48:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gEngZ-0005DG-Ro for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:48:55 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x530.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::530]:36471) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gEngZ-0005Ce-JJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:48:51 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-x530.google.com with SMTP id l6-v6so1291552pgp.3 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 20:48:51 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <20181022170731.13db3f3b@scratchpost.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: Guix-devel Hey Danny, > welcome back! Thank you :) > I agree. I've been meaning to write parted bindings for guile, but > I got side-tracked with https://github.com/daym/guile-gcc-unit which > can extract prototypes out of gcc source files (in order to automate > wrapper generation). Now I'm motivated to pick it up again. I was thinking of writing Guile FFI based bindings in the same spirit as for Guile-git or Guile-newt. However, if we can write a nice higher level abstraction above generated bindings, I guess it would be ok too. Pyparted which was mainly written for Anaconda adopted the strategy of exporting libparted functions in Python via 1:1 function mapping and then writting a higher level abstraction built on that. Anyway, your help would be much appreciated on this part that will be the trickier :) Thank you, Mathieu