From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Sassmannshausen Subject: Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines? (-> convivenza) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 13:01:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87in1l9d2e.fsf@gmail.com> References: <11169507.O9o76ZdvQC@aleksandar-ixtreme-m5740> <20181029113703.aoglk75dihqmvsup@abyayala> Reply-To: alex.sassmannshausen@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33394) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gH6F4-0002Nh-5U for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 08:01:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gH6Er-0000mP-H7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 08:01:56 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]:35881) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gH6Er-0000Tq-77 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 08:01:45 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id x2-v6so7030935eds.3 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 05:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rosser ([2a02:a03f:3e87:f200:3334:574b:c0fa:4107]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m19-v6sm3624250ejz.70.2018.10.29.05.01.30 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 05:01:30 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <20181029113703.aoglk75dihqmvsup@abyayala> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, Nils Gillmann writes: > I have followed most of the breaking threads, and I will keep > my contribution to simply stating what a friend wrote: > > https://mobile.twitter.com/lynXintl/status/1055146900100390913 > > In essence this refers to convivenza, which in my opinion > is a much better suited framework for this than what > has been brought up so far: > https://structure.pages.de/convivenza > > Interested groups can contract the structure work group > (https://structure.pages.de/) and work out implementations. > > I don't want any follow-ups directed at myself, I don't > have the time to deal with circular discussions wrt this. > Take it as a statement of recommendation. I found this a very interesting text, thanks for sharing. Personally I will be thinking about it for a while :-) Alex