From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [Cuirass] Missing database indexes?
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 12:14:56 +0100
Message-ID: <87in0zj4gf.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87va54yh0c.fsf@gnu.org> <20181110211128.6dc522da@alma-ubu>
	<87k1ljr1c7.fsf@gnu.org> <20181112195044.6d64f51c@alma-ubu>
	<20181113002715.33a00ea1@scratchpost.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37648)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1gMt8N-0000tA-Nm
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 06:15:00 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1gMt8M-00006E-PC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 06:14:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20181113002715.33a00ea1@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's
	message of "Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:27:15 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, clement@lassieur.org

Hello,

Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> skribis:

> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 19:50:44 +0100
> Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de> wrote:
>
>> Hm. This code smells ... It looks too complicated.
>
> I was trying to cut down the number of prepared statements in use and pre=
vent a
> combinatorial explosion while keeping the kinds of queries we can do open.

I understand both arguments.  I wonder if there=E2=80=99s a way to concilia=
te
these two issues.  What do you both think?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.