From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: Re: .guix-channel: Quote inconsistency Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 23:06:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87imvl8ta9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tvf89zn3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44685) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEKQ7-0006Ic-9W for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 17:06:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87tvf89zn3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> (Pierre Neidhardt's message of "Mon, 08 Apr 2019 19:26:40 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: Guix-devel Hello, Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > I haven't looked at the code and I guess that .guix-channel is only > READ, not EVALed, while channels.scm is a first-class scheme code, > right? Exactly. > Maybe we could match both 'SOME-NAME and SOME-NAME? I suppose we could do that. And/or we could make it clearer that the =E2=80=98.guix-channel=E2=80=99 syntax has nothing to do with that of =E2=80=98channels.scm=E2=80=99, even if it looks similar. WDYT? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.