From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55253)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hdvYh-00089o-NT
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:48:52 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hdvQA-0006DC-G5
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:40:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34421)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hdvQA-0006D2-BY
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:40:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hdvQA-0002ch-6y
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:40:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#35545] [PATCH] Add josm.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.35545.B35545.156103079010061@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <20190503145820.606f37db@sybil.lepiller.eu>
 <20190505131838.2ea2c6d9@alma-ubu>
 <20190505133709.049a2925@sybil.lepiller.eu>
 <20190506005353.3c9b20d7@alma-ubu>
 <20190618142928.528d0b0b@tachikoma.lepiller.eu>
 <20190618181447.405200fd@alma-ubu>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 13:39:22 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20190618181447.405200fd@alma-ubu> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?="'s message of
 "Tue, 18 Jun 2019 18:14:47 +0200")
Message-ID: <87imt0lc45.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de>
Cc: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>, 35545@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello!

Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de> skribis:

> On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:29:36 +0200

[...]

>> So I've looked into that, but I haven't seen how to disable the plugin
>> manager. I've talked to a JOSM developper during State of the Map
>> France, and he told me every plugin was free software, and if not, it
>> should be considered a bug, and the plugin will be removed. I think
>> this is close to the spirit of the FSDG, so we might not have to
>> disable the manager. WDYT?

That sounds reasonable to me: if upstream has a clear commitment to
publish only free software plugin, then we can take their word for it;
if later that proved to be misguided, we can revisit this issue and
disable the installation of plugins coming from their site.

>> I agree it would be nicer to bootstrap plugins properly ourselves, but
>> at least we won't advertise for non free plugins. I'll try to update
>> to a newer version before pushing, unless you have more objections.

Indeed, it=E2=80=99d be much nicer if users of JOSM on Guix could install
plugins via Guix, both because it=E2=80=99s more convenient and because it=
=E2=80=99s
provides much stronger guarantees (reproducibly built from source!).

My 2=C2=A2,
Ludo=E2=80=99.