From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42441)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hiLAU-0005Or-DY
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 11:58:10 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hiLAR-0005Ee-5K
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 11:58:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38900)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hiLAQ-0005EG-La
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 11:58:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hiLAQ-0000Sr-IN
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2019 11:58:02 -0400
Subject: bug#36126: [PATCH] Add ghc-validation.
Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36126.D36126.15620830411733.done@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <CACy6W0BDu==156_ecYYEgO6iO-vXO0hezi-F+PwdvAi64E_bmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2019 17:57:05 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CACy6W0BDu==156_ecYYEgO6iO-vXO0hezi-F+PwdvAi64E_bmg@mail.gmail.com>
 (Jacob MacDonald's message of "Fri, 7 Jun 2019 06:51:52 -0500")
Message-ID: <87imsk5t0u.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Jacob MacDonald <jaccarmac@gmail.com>
Cc: 36126-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello Jacob,

Jacob MacDonald <jaccarmac@gmail.com> skribis:

> The version bump pushes guix refresh over the 300-package line. Given
> that and the fact that there are dependencies on older versions in the
> tree, would it be better to give the newer version a special name
> instead, or did I make the correct choice here?

I think you did it right.  :-)

> Guix packages are a new foray for me, so I imagine something will be
> wrong. Did my best to split into proper dependency order though, and
> ready to touch up.

I applied all 7 patches to =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99 (I added a copyright li=
ne for you).
It=E2=80=99s above the 300-package line as you write, but these packages bu=
ild
fairly quickly, so I think it=E2=80=99s OK.

Thanks for the patch set, and apologies for the delay!

Ludo=E2=80=99.