From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally built ones Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:09:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87imqpqzos.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875znwcoo9.fsf@netris.org> <87ef2j1pgt.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftmy51kk.fsf@netris.org> <87muh6sib4.fsf@gnu.org> <877e8a79mz.fsf@netris.org> <87pnm2ufv1.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfwpqpb7.fsf@netris.org> <875znt2hlc.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhke97xj.fsf@netris.org> <87h86mdaex.fsf@gnu.org> <8736i5a7mb.fsf@netris.org> <87mugdbc9r.fsf@gnu.org> <8736i3iyas.fsf@devup.no> <87zhkbhd07.fsf@devup.no> <87v9uz4msh.fsf@netris.org> <87woffh66h.fsf@devup.no> <87o90pgzak.fsf@gnu.org> <87mug9cagh.fsf@netris.org> <87ftlujj1f.fsf@gnu.org> <87r25e2kjz.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58052) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i0k2e-0002GC-HQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 06:10:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0k2c-0002ig-Lw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 06:10:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i0k2c-0002i3-GG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 06:10:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87r25e2kjz.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Wed, 21 Aug 2019 18:57:25 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: 36747@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Mark H Weaver skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Mark H Weaver skribis: >> >>> You can reproduce them with the following command from a git checkout at >>> commit 9e6256ba0f32ab12d61c914a3fed879dac881762, which is the tip of the >>> 'wip-binaries' branch, based on recent 'master': >>> >>> ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=3Di686-linux bootstrap-tarballs >>> >>> mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ git describe >>> v1.0.1-2479-g9e6256ba0f >>> mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=3Di68= 6-linux bootstrap-tarballs >>> /gnu/store/rdwyr8mh7dvhfkb5g4cws6q40hp23rbi-bootstrap-tarballs-0 >>> mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ cd /gnu/store/rdwyr8mh7dvhfkb5g4cws6q40h= p23rbi-bootstrap-tarballs-0 >>> mhw@jojen /gnu/store/rdwyr8mh7dvhfkb5g4cws6q40hp23rbi-bootstrap-tarball= s-0$ sha256sum * >>> 3e50c070a100b6bcf84c4bf5c868f9cd0a9fd1570f5d82fbfb78f8411959091b guile= -static-stripped-2.2.4-i686-linux.tar.xz >>> 1acd8f83e27d2fac311a5ca78e9bf11a9a1638b82469870d5c854c4e7afaa26a linux= -libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz >>> 021543d9bb6af55f39e68d69692e3cb74646ced2cad0bb9ac0047ef81e9d7330 mescc= -tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-i686-linux.tar.xz >>> fb32090071b39fc804fb9a7fba96f0bc5eb844a0efd268fb24c42e6bfa959de0 mes-m= inimal-stripped-0.19-i686-linux.tar.xz >>> c80cdd17b0a24eebdd75570ff72c4ec06e129bd702ac008186b57f6301c448e7 stati= c-binaries-0-i686-linux.tar.xz >>> >>> Do you get the same results? >> >> I built it on bayfront and got the exact same result: > > I'm glad to hear it! Marius and Janneke got these exact results as > well, albeit at a different commit which should be equivalent. Great. >> (I=E2=80=99m actually surprised Guile is 100% reproducible; ISTR there w= ere >> still issues with gensyms in .go files, but maybe I=E2=80=99m wrong.) > > It's apparently not reproducible unless built sequentially. I did some > preliminary investigation, and my guess is that the gensyms produced by > Guile's compiler sometimes depends on whether dependent modules were > previously compiled or not. I see. >> So, green light, right? > > Yes! > >>> To match what 'core-updates-next' expects, it would be good to upload >>> the files above, along with digital signatures, to the following new >>> directory: >>> >>> https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/bootstrap/i686-linux/20190815/ >> >> Unless you disagree, I=E2=80=99ll upload these to ftp.gnu.org (not >> alpha.gnu.org, but same directory as you wrote) tomorrow. > > That's fine, although I guess %bootstrap-base-urls will need to be > extended to include the new base URL. Uploaded to . I adjusted =E2=80=98%bootstrap-base-urls=E2=80=99 and the branch is now being= evaluated for real: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates-next Thanks everyone for verifying and =E2=80=9Cfixing=E2=80=9D these bootstrap = binaries, and apologies for delaying the process! Ludo=E2=80=99.