From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: Re: 01/01: services: Add =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98=2Fusr=2Fbin=2Fenv?= =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=99?= special file. Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2019 12:06:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87imq4whtt.fsf@nckx> References: <20190906102509.28951.2772@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190906102510.002BE21324@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87d0gdbtji.fsf@cbaines.net> <87mufhwhc6.fsf@nckx> <874l1p80zr.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45231) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i6Xcd-00071G-Ag for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 06:07:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i6XcY-0008E6-VO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 06:07:08 -0400 Received: from tobias.gr ([80.241.217.52]:45288) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i6XcY-0008Cq-D0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2019 06:07:06 -0400 In-reply-to: <874l1p80zr.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark, Mark H Weaver =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > This should have been discussed more widely before pushing to=20 > 'master'. It should certainly have been discussed more widely before=20 reverting like you did. There was plenty of opportunity for you=20 to respond before that[0]. I have the impression this is not going anywhere productive, so=20 shall we just drop this meta-discussion? Despite what you may think, I *am* interested in your (or any)=20 reasoning to include /bin/sh and not /usr/bin/sh, but understand=20 the energy involved in reiterating. I'd rather see them both=20 gone; this was my compromise. Kind regards, T G-R [0]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D35910 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCXXOBQQAKCRANsP+IT1Vt eW12AP9tWwpZacRzzxVYu9TcBbSp2l75j5C6buZ2xBw57AdToAD/TRF7cmaJdIoJ uytu/usigYkogsj2jXTyJnu/7rB5CAw= =SKCc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--