From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mike.rosset@gmail.com Subject: Re: qtwenengine anybody? Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 12:24:52 -0800 Message-ID: <87imltk3mz.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a77sqtdq.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87immgqryj.fsf@gmail.com> <871rt4qnp9.fsf@gmail.com> <87immgp582.fsf@gmail.com> <5955729d-ef57-ffb8-feb8-36a9f53658a2@crazy-compilers.com> <87d0clpbt6.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2v7e0g4.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87v9qb56gg.fsf@gmail.com> <87sglfotvj.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87o8w354m5.fsf@gmail.com> <87blrod2so.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <878smsd2pe.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87mub7krlq.fsf@gmail.com> <87tv5e9acb.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <871rsilshf.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60292) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1in71d-0001xa-4H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 15:24:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1in71b-0003F2-TD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 15:24:56 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f]:43620) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1in71b-0003E7-Nw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 15:24:55 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id p27so18223966pli.10 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 12:24:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Hartmut Goebel's message of "Thu, 2 Jan 2020 13:29:34 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Hartmut Goebel Cc: Guix-devel Hartmut Goebel writes: > Am 01.01.20 um 23:30 schrieb mike.rosset@gmail.com: >> I think the package is looking pretty good now. I sent some changes >> requested by Hartmut today so we might need to wait on any more changes >> he might have. > > I tried applying the patches to see the complete/compiled diff, but `git > am` failed. Can you please send an updated patch or provide a link to > some online-repo to view the complete diff. Thanks Apologies this is probably a failure in my ML workflow. And just my luck I'm in the process of doing some working related moving todoy. Here is a complete diff https://gitlab.com/mike.rosset/guix/compare/master...qtwebengine hope this helps. Mike