From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34391) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ioQf0-0004tQ-Lm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 06:35:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ioQez-0002c3-Nn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 06:35:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39289) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ioQez-0002by-Km for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 06:35:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ioQez-0007wT-IR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 06:35:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#38986] Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: Add peg.) Resent-Message-ID: References: <20200106113042.33516-1-josh@inv.alid.pw> From: Josh Holland In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 11:34:21 +0000 Message-ID: <87imlo7r9e.fsf@inv.alid.pw> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 38986@debbugs.gnu.org FWIW, if maintainers prefer, this package could also justifiably be named `pegleg`. I stuck with the upstream tarball name for now. -- Josh Holland