From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id SC6tJ70R/1/PRQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:29:01 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id WBF9I70R/1/jJgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:29:01 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 216A79403AC for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50546 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzi4y-0003JQ-17 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:29:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37700) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzhtO-0000gi-TF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:17:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzhtO-0001Ut-Jn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:17:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzhtO-0008Vw-EY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#45405] [PATCH] gnu: Update Xfce base to 4.16.0. Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45405 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Michael Rohleder Received: via spool by 45405-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45405.161055096932645 (code B ref 45405); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:17:02 +0000 Received: (at 45405) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2021 15:16:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36279 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzhsX-0008UT-Ea for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:16:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44158) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzhsV-0008U6-LV for 45405@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:16:07 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57805) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzhsO-00012I-UH; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:16:01 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=39476 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kzhsN-0004em-U5; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:16:00 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20201224132146.25275-1-mike@rohleder.de> <874kkayuuv.fsf@rohleder.de> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 16:15:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <874kkayuuv.fsf@rohleder.de> (Michael Rohleder's message of "Fri, 25 Dec 2020 12:43:04 +0100") Message-ID: <87im8098b5.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45405@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.86 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 216A79403AC X-Spam-Score: -2.86 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: f41016ccs1+U Hi Michael, Michael Rohleder skribis: > Jonathan Brielmaier writes: >> Nice one! Although I find it better to have each update as a seperate >> commit. If we stick with this big commit we can at least make the commit >> message a bit leaner: >> >> * gnu/packages/xfce.scm (libxfce4util): Update to 4.16.0. >> (xfconf): Update to 4.16.0. >> >> [arguments]: Remove failing custom-check phase. Disabled tests. >> (libxfce4ui): Update to 4.16.0. >> >> [inputs]: Remove unneeded gtk+-2. >> ... >> > > A seperate commit for each update would not build inbetween, because of > some (inter)dependencies (libxfce4util, etc...), no? Probably; a single commit makes sense when updating large intertwined stacks like this. I think this fell through the cracks during the holidays. Should we go ahead and apply it; are there additional changes needed? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.