From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id gIG6Lz2jNWBWegAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:52:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id gJ16Kz2jNWDIHgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:52:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FFA0135EA for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:52:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37784 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEiPT-0001AA-JY for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:52:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39792) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEiPL-00019r-GI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:52:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49507) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEiPJ-0004cv-SE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:52:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEiPJ-0005xl-Pq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:52:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#44492] [PATCH] Add fractal. Resent-From: Christopher Baines Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44492 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Leo Prikler Cc: 44492@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 44492-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44492.161412788022872 (code B ref 44492); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:52:01 +0000 Received: (at 44492) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2021 00:51:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32820 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEiOe-0005wq-Hj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:51:20 -0500 Received: from mira.cbaines.net ([212.71.252.8]:34494) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEiOd-0005wi-1W for 44492@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:51:19 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8010:68c1:0:8ac0:b4c7:f5c8:7caa]) by mira.cbaines.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53FE427BC4A; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:51:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from capella (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id cea19c2e; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:51:18 +0000 (UTC) References: <87tuu2p37n.fsf@cbaines.net> <0e1001712034f0717ba6504b0c4cda27f5e42e94.camel@student.tugraz.at> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.14; emacs 27.1 From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: <0e1001712034f0717ba6504b0c4cda27f5e42e94.camel@student.tugraz.at> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:51:15 +0000 Message-ID: <87im6il24c.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.47 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1FFA0135EA X-Spam-Score: -4.47 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: LL9kXPC6/yvw --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Prikler writes: > I really wish I had seen your patch set earlier. It would have saved > me a lot of trouble while packaging 4.4.0 =E2=80=93 or at least I think s= o. > > My patches live over at [2], apart from the licenses I'm fairly certain > that they're correct. Should I git:send-email them, so that patchwork > can pick them up? Looks like you've got less commits at least, which is probably good. As for sending them, sure, I'd suggest to continue to use this bug. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKlBAEBCgCPFiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAmA1owNfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcRHG1haWxAY2Jh aW5lcy5uZXQACgkQXiijOwuE9Xf8qxAAmfAFKMcpHqAAu4FDwFT8wKfNvjzPUjXg P4lBGh75olWvKpQCcw6IjE0cIEhArDGS1WGnyGNKcNSdXd635dNq1zvmDJahEIqy 9+0PXM0MyP9SngrmAsd99NnmO8D59XEZGz0DfKU8ODxKmi7rW+3cNrYXEVTxzNYM 4X9efQPXQEVpNYlyD9DKmZlgSqxIrH0XZ2QDS6FZ2Scz2Y7MkqjdlIfjPuztfNMV 1E6xdthr15XCMPUEzQNyol1PuatmmgN4c/ems+V1hnmaUZtL9mAr1tm4RTrENi6v wP8wYiXHsgfyvgHC2ldhlmyETI6oCQI6cQdw63yIeWSSrNFKonHpnyZbMbS/vpH3 4Fgq6OuFstM6GpHfztq4Ahk+6clH5CPfHH25yZL/kgEr03Xj5Xp8y30vqArXnn+q FBDcBKts7D4+t1esFQw8xvEasGHhxnSQPriNMO1qkQY/w+p75AcvqqlWjoGATieP vk1/igLeZ6tr/QErVrM0wyPMdzzlCJmKolo1U0/9zgeboQAns4WbRw2t/xGRdKUJ awl8nobyDMG9GDXTqYCpwtXwpl6ZtTi1wHv/ZziK9ygoTibj5UA65D+1aKzWw9sN ftyH5/Htrc8VaCpKDdOFA26F8rbpHONrb7Wr42pacBwCIj5DREBo+fGVBvd2hilE GkLZR7bbCG4= =dm0D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--