From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id MIA0Oe/3eWBGjwAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 22:47:43 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 0KV+M+/3eWDHRwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 20:47:43 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A44F2A22B for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 22:47:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36332 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXVNN-0000qS-IU for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:47:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXVMk-0000UV-86 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:47:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58470) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXVMk-0008CG-18 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:47:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXVMj-0004AT-Va for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:47:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47222: Serious bug in Nettle's ecdsa_verify Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 20:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47222 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: security To: 47222@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47222-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47222.161860602116015 (code B ref 47222); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 20:47:01 +0000 Received: (at 47222) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2021 20:47:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41783 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXVMi-0004AE-Ln for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:47:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55902) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lXVMg-00049y-Ve for 47222@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:46:59 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48104) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lXVMb-00086L-CE; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:46:53 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=39792 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lXVMa-0004Hz-TR; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:46:53 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <875z1kl24h.fsf@netris.org> <87h7kzblxk.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 22:46:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: ("Niels =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6ller?="'s message of "Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:21:40 +0100") Message-ID: <87im4m2c05.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1618606063; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=Ghc2e2Ev4pMwAQN+YiBIlzfYdlfr2bQYJoiMu2Az6xI=; b=HgtEcussBtQ9QZEK8m2ecHmdFo0/bK89m4dfkTEMHLtXMKYXJYnozsru0n2Zb2Zwi7P5oQ xffazXKX8cbDkQ6VsnV5K5UVDl/rY12cGGMXTw0r4yk4Hp6CahJbT4epnGv2IAuBNq5QTu sX93JvUDAFpB8alX5Au92zoKPn9kTrc2GKOgCuo9eHVypXO6Srlyon286h80gTQCV8RxxG m0bkpJjua/h7/F8xE2nUSCIMUwFqZJ144ZJv9EA7h8FAy5iS5ce4Oi55AqctBYyfp1wZPn bIFcmwHXvyjd7qiQVbw+dKIlGqbV5K03kv1iPMwP6OLdyleyLQeBeb7SwPlBXw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1618606063; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=fgq6TFrv2kcZ+cFb11pGwFXMds3uFT1cCer+cQlreDHXxBnUsFYi9lmVudpk+Kbb0jkuXm R3LMysPLlQgsMq3sS4cF+jafoWNqVEvE/IxtotBDjJmkC3PskuHiHXHvlfIUwLzWlso4Yu nALkv6QC0SbgxQV+0YhaQq4/BLvqqD42uknQMSXkSFv7nCDxi/rz0rALGDa5Df/kLOlRzH SECWEDSnBPjmnO7XvKTaL8Vf76cgkKnwhsDx+mCr75FpGmiMMYy8lOkZlqQI0pGCZLcBCW WX7iFhodh2SyVq+gBFEA/3UkjxvqXJB/jtzp84iUacblgCxDBpgObnD4b+OtJw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.94 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4A44F2A22B X-Spam-Score: -2.94 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: qPrtyoMu1K7i Hi! (- Niels, - nettle-bugs) nisse@lysator.liu.se (Niels M=C3=B6ller) skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > >> Are there plans to make a new 3.5 release including these fixes? > > No, I don't plan any 3.5.x release. > >> Alternatively, could you provide guidance as to which commits should be >> cherry-picked in 3.5 for downstream distros? > > Look at the branch release-3.7-fixes > (https://git.lysator.liu.se/nettle/nettle/-/commits/release-3.7-fixes/). > The commits since 3.7.1 are the ones you need. > > Changes to gostdsa and ed448 will not apply, since those curves didn't > exist in nettle-3.5. Changes to ed25519 might not apply cleanly, due to > refactoring when adding ed448. I confirm these patches don=E2=80=99t apply, and I=E2=80=99m not comfortabl= e fiddling with that. Leo and I checked and found that Debian doesn=E2=80=99t have 3.5. Do other distros have backports of these patches to 3.5? If not, our options are: 1. to invest in the backport ourselves, with good peer review, ideally getting it stamped by Niels & co; 2. to wait until a full rebuild has come. It=E2=80=99s not an ideal situation. Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99.