[bug#50174] [PATCH core-updates-frozen 1/2] gnu: make-bootstrap: Fix build of static gawk.

[Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>]

Hello,

Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann@kolabnow.com> writes:

> Hello Ludo,
>
> Em terça-feira, 28 de setembro de 2021, às 19:19:04 -03, Ludovic Courtès 
> escreveu:
>> Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann@kolabnow.com> skribis:
>> > Em segunda-feira, 27 de setembro de 2021, às 18:38:45 -03, Ludovic
>> > Courtès> 
>> > escreveu:
>> >> Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauermann@kolabnow.com> skribis:
>> >> > gawk for ‘static-binaries-tarball’ is failing to build natively, at
>> >> > least for x86_64-linux¹ and powerpc64le-linux. On both of them, the
>> >> > problem is the same:
>> >> > 
>> >> > ld: ext.o: in function `load_ext':
>> >> > /tmp/guix-build-gawk-5.1.0.drv-0/gawk-5.1.0/ext.c:59: warning: Using
>> >> > 'dlopen' in statically linked applications requires at runtime the
>> >> > shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking ld:
>> >> > /gnu/store/qmgsfxm3ad5n7bi947n7xw0wq86blqr9-glibc-2.33-static/lib/li
>> >> > bc
>> >> > .a(getopt.o): in function `_getopt_internal_r': (.text+0x6e0):
>> >> > multiple
>> >> > definition of `_getopt_internal_r';
>> >> > support/libsupport.a(getopt.o):/tmp/guix-build-gawk-5.1.0.drv-0/gawk
>> >> > -5
>> >> > .1.0/support/getopt.c:404: first defined here
>> >> 
>> >> I don’t see that on x86_64/i686:
>> >> 
>> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> >> $ ./pre-inst-env  guix weather bootstrap-tarballs -s x86_64-linux -s
>> >> i686-linux> 
>> > I’m using the package ‘static-binaries-tarball’ to expose the issue.
>> > IIUC, the static binaries (of which ‘gawk-static’ is one) aren’t used
>> > for bootstrapping on i686-linux and x86_64-linux so you won’t see this
>> > problem with ‘bootstrap-tarballs’ on those platforms.
>> > 
>> >> -s aarch64-linux -s armhf-linux
>> > 
>> > OTOH, these platforms do use the static binaries. For some reason which
>> > TBH I didn’t try to investigate, ‘gawk-static’ cross-builds correctly
>> > so you’ll only see this problem on native builds of
>> > ‘bootstrap-tarballs’ or ‘static-binaries-tarball’.
>> Oooh, my bad, sorry for the confusion.
>
> No problem!
>  
>> >> Substitutes are missing for the following items:
>> >>   /gnu/store/3c8gbn2gljj48wihs9h3nxmfwix55wrn-bootstrap-tarballs-0
>> >>   
>> >>        armhf-linux
>> >> 
>> >> /gnu/store/8b6rznm54l6drbs6qfca5bi8yjqbx51f-bootstrap-tarballs-0
>> >> 
>> >>       aarch64-linux
>> > 
>> > Doesn’t this mean that there is indeed a problem with
>> > ‘bootstrap-tarballs’ on these platforms?
>> 
>> Yes, it does!  But I thought it might be “something else”.
>> 
>> I fixed it slightly differently in
>> 7d30e6e5c21f5e0b79f73428414fef2dbf75e7a6, followed by the second patch
>> you had here. 
>
> Your solution is better indeed. Thanks!
>
>> Let’s see how far that brings us towards ’static-binaries-tarball’.
>
> According to the CI, x86_64-linux and i686-linux are fixed now. aarch64-
> linux failed but that’s because of a bug in QEMU. powerpc64-linux is 
> scheduled to build but there’s a backlog in the CI for some reason.
>
>> Thank you & sorry for the delay!
>
> No problem at all. Thank you for fixing this problem!

Seems Ludovic pushed a derived fix.  Thank you both!

Closing.

Maxim