From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2NznAy8pN2L93AAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 14:16:31 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id 4ABVAS8pN2JuJgEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 14:16:31 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF7E82AB66 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 14:16:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40254 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nVvQ5-0007NS-RT for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 09:16:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:36006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nVvPh-0007MD-3l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 09:16:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39300) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nVvPf-0007F4-Bd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 09:16:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nVvPf-0007OO-0l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 09:16:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#54352] [PATCH v2] services: dnsmasq: Add more options. Resent-From: Remco van 't Veer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2022 13:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54352 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Maxime Devos Cc: 54352@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 54352-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54352.164778214928358 (code B ref 54352); Sun, 20 Mar 2022 13:16:02 +0000 Received: (at 54352) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Mar 2022 13:15:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33195 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nVvPR-0007NK-C2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 09:15:49 -0400 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:40245) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nVvPP-0007Mq-8u for 54352@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 09:15:48 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5253200974; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 09:15:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 20 Mar 2022 09:15:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=remworks.net; h= cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; bh=vQKAz3BCVgUPzLAQrIatsgKEBRRXs2BTBPAYbi yCM9Y=; b=hDfWZ9NeLhRHof1VvJg1h1euLaXWFZY4SIArQcKZoRAJeRcuQHYuYt 1vaBo90M0qToRaOM5nau6uwkNcuVGN1K6FS7iRFOrFdPLG5q1lyOkwFIqmxRuH0N Sw0NhjMcyUHxmeEho0H2WFWoaNVhePON2pNXJ7acyS1qNNIYwlXfrqlktdno2QQP S2UKMc6+t2xCf6xUxMpy0IvEpfMFvGVj2gU+IbDj1QDjg2/BqKZmXIZ334CBF8Qt bG3udZCz3CzB3Nxjh+vYUR7Pw2eaHzWRvr9aZ4CYH1eKko4dR9+MJYEmYpvfQe/J 6v2FkmGGPnTAIxkl8Q5kWCLU9y+ke97w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=vQKAz3BCVgUPzLAQr IatsgKEBRRXs2BTBPAYbiyCM9Y=; b=DtwDlAjb0x3JdMBY24Ep6+MMwcRiNvtN8 +/uUsOep8PQg9OawKAyrHEBjMpjFlnDI6zyDHj0HUZcMPxVrovoC1JCv2Np/j94x 36n1Kly9ZRlLLxZ1QCjFM7ShPPgU55atHFxhU2qyN/Hd3LNwWte/F2VAicZ9aakD CxczmBH56ItmR8xGlsS1EfAzqY2P7lQwryMg5a52JexQcjiyt2Jx7edXB8+VGMon z4igdqBKjlJ2xmNUZWvgFZNyn7ypaEiOsKlBtNgX86D1HDCOTY32i7pPzGygeDHT W3exMgYNysmsuggp1PuuUeTbltnBCxV8hBE4O/uiK7SgIkemLXKjQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrudeguddghedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfhgfhffvufgjfffkgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghmtgho uchvrghnucdkthcugggvvghruceorhgvmhgtohesrhgvmhifohhrkhhsrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeuledvteevteehfeduvefhjeduvefgkeehledtgfegvdeugeff hfekieejkedtgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehrvghmtghosehrvghmfihorhhkshdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 20 Mar 2022 09:15:40 -0400 (EDT) References: <20220312154813.5538-1-remco@remworks.net> <20220320114405.4702-1-remco@remworks.net> <956761e46ca4fdd9fb77e3d85f5eaaa125145a57.camel@telenet.be> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.10; emacs 27.2 From: Remco van 't Veer In-reply-to: <956761e46ca4fdd9fb77e3d85f5eaaa125145a57.camel@telenet.be> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2022 14:15:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87ils8bw91.fsf@remworks.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1647782190; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=vQKAz3BCVgUPzLAQrIatsgKEBRRXs2BTBPAYbiyCM9Y=; b=Fx8O4eOIg/D/ENQrh07wyI//ku0U0gkRB9ikFh6C6QPPGCNpFM7blyUgEEtiLmsBG9VZ3s jEkSK3HEum2Y7KpjvO1txoOgmDBdddIxsRFvl8Iw/Lct3OClhDMT8vqyH7l0yUDfFe4r7D X3UIj0WyVutmVBc4p6gPJECnqobxMQErZ4SFrT+sW1j9/DR+MGqbfHikewZ5GUjlzhh+lZ WBH4YY2omuo9eynlADB0LQo6qOItWUtYnxiq2S1eZdE4BUJ5e3P54FngneOKbiuPQ4m7FH hRRi7HQj7JxG+Gv3HVr6o2dO4s1WcN52tKy+/MxXM8VffZP6Pn0GenKxKNk1Sw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1647782190; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=WmRdhM0CxjIKRBo50D1Guj/vuSwsIaAvtHseYUx2MwYpyExiC3x1mQrowdKswucdhB9o5C 6/AEpE3wr4MjbGh9t8WotK0CFihHxcSMnw/oQLuB6EjnEmFCKwxjCm2/MK/oH4NEbZ4LeQ U2y9jdCDQmNiqOuLTalQYCkR2Nceka46DfSl6XSzAcgXI0AknSvPt6ApK3QVedCVVC40Gs sAUiG9xfOqPPP04s76nNaIo+5O6ZXMUBDe8cofF7JwtKjYxIxwXvmsFan8iy2zd/CgPDRn gJP4RN8CnN+9pEDnqXOvAM7zOFDs3GDJtwVS6JBET5Es71Uk7LXy8nkU6Au/WQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=remworks.net header.s=fm3 header.b=hDfWZ9Ne; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=DtwDlAjb; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.17 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=remworks.net header.s=fm3 header.b=hDfWZ9Ne; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=DtwDlAjb; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: BF7E82AB66 X-Spam-Score: 0.17 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: a6DP+YeuJH5L I totally agree with the naming suggestions and will apply them but what if somebody has been using dnsmasq before? In that case they will not recognize the options and which may cause confusion. I guess the answer to that is that guix should not propagate the wording mistakes made upstream? To help those with prior knowledge of dnsmasq, I could add a config-file field. WDYT?