Re: August/November update on qa.guix.gnu.org and related things

[Suhail <suhail@bayesians.ca>]

"Tomas Volf" <~@wolfsden.cz> writes:

> On 2023-11-02 16:38:29 +0000, Suhail wrote:
>> [..]
>> -- 
>> Suhail
>> 
>> This email is not an offer capable of acceptance, does not evidence an
>> intention to enter into an agreement, has no operative effect until a
>> definitive agreement is signed in writing by both parties, and that no
>> party should act in reliance on the email or any representations of the
>> sender until a definitive agreement is signed in writing by both
>> parties.
>
> I am unsure what is the takeaway from this paragraph.

I am not a lawyer, so take my interpretation with sufficient grains of
salt. To me, the takeaway is that a message with that signature does not
constitute a legally binding contract and thus limits liability.

> I would suggest not sending a privileged, confidential and/or exempt
> from disclosure information to a public mailing list.

You're correct. Thank you for catching that. I've gotten rid of the
offending clause.

-- 
Suhail

This email is not an offer capable of acceptance, does not evidence an
intention to enter into an agreement, has no operative effect until a
definitive agreement is signed in writing by both parties, and that no
party should act in reliance on the email or any representations of the
sender until a definitive agreement is signed in writing by both
parties.