From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id cEFwAeQawWVc8wAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 18:29:08 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id cEFwAeQawWVc8wAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 18:29:08 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=lassieur.org header.s=fm2 header.b=POZtSusZ; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b="u RdEOS4"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1707154147; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=0GecvQwwp7QvApdC46+8Mp8pqMCx2JFDAB0tAu4OcP0=; b=JQFyShxltuzHkQM4/hvvrnRk9JJt6QDHB/5cAGeEqHsKzVWnRASvd+4/B1onhZMDnm7aTb Wetn7HVE/YWK/KtdxWCCXND50rq1L+aLXRjnHurSymwGsz/ZWFuk71A4ik4Lu5h4lOgKde Pyxjp5wChyCXGzbbJehAdurTdwbWQ1I0ceSvynat/VUbw1um5zPBsKhuIU6QAVrWCF+7n/ N5vavwIm+cy3BIvZbCo/iLRi7ptaBkful1oDlFx/W9zqRK9j6P0me0vdHZ7vd+XuKZsBqC qIU+QLlyRbYy4r5gJQWy8JfmY9HNFpE12pjcxTHw9DMTPIYkJFpOtemGRFW2OA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=lassieur.org header.s=fm2 header.b=POZtSusZ; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b="u RdEOS4"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1707154147; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=WipohRb84+bUwn9r2jB6dCeOCTliLGExEukb9cNXiGaWQsjTI2hMR129Uvp1NtqzXO7HpS DDBLkkZsF1xYgBQE30nghM17ucHREMBvEUzvrKEC5nyhGfQd/rDXSRGmarM4L9Ta1/ij+G DNephPyVMTaj4nfFkW50+TB0vWPcQM14h0m++VfwnoAk6oim9XuI0qTyiZOpZpWR+fq+SU 8CC05yAaoGGnZaJa1b7qL5YOi6DNz4ayf53XUzy0XG2YUES5eWdf5dVPBaCXLB5sQ2ERIB koVTXP6NgoqY/L7pOCeFYT2UHNVqGZsna04Yygw1oU88cfINRR+TiL3vKt//NQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D83E756D7D for ; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 18:29:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rX2lr-0002d3-Aq; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 12:28:39 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rX2lp-0002TY-Eh; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 12:28:37 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rX2ln-0006gc-M8; Mon, 05 Feb 2024 12:28:37 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78055C0064; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 12:28:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 05 Feb 2024 12:28:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lassieur.org; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1707154114; x=1707240514; bh=0GecvQwwp7QvApdC46+8Mp8pqMCx2JFDAB0tAu4OcP0=; b= POZtSusZfNkgOJm1KP901nA/xrdKedwP78M7VgzW/rf09/8QuAiRG8hE+2q21/V0 OkIj01G7sfEQXLbZHc5R28lOg3jXQgxSjCaA74fhtUYB8lf1v2JZttb1dONHJnYr HrCboDYgfETF3TVw+cJYbDldYE8v9T9lWbFq/9hilpgZzMUNmtaPQg4lW6vpsj7f AUpsZWhYuUmAzVWusrPnJnXvzNNUC1JvE7CTFFOPRS7Xwcr31+SCW7blsxeP6v/B TbbDhS6ycnPO4QSQY7UTqPGKt6tCV3a8Yt9C11oFoTwboPh115raclL4W4DOx436 CnTnfEbOGPCnCv25wBCeHw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1707154114; x= 1707240514; bh=0GecvQwwp7QvApdC46+8Mp8pqMCx2JFDAB0tAu4OcP0=; b=u RdEOS4Q+L1vxoZ8TcxAoxXfo7UqLQa2WLessDZMCBTQCVmwYTPP+6GXnJGPSfCW/ 8LJ9E+tFj66sFzdDbY08pdrZqkyKJBup+RVcHkRlWPnEIX0bKFAmuCO1HhWDpR1Y T/P+H2SrLeWV5lTh5xq82MotDcuQlO6GGGZA4jhqjiMZgJMBXQwYpBOauvGCOOCb UDV10sID2PWWLHGCLomtm7b1lwlAyN10CFONTBN1wTLyqSJCrhSFXobYSAs0ScUC TtoLMwBlSZlJetDCJF7vos31hjkq305u8ShA7wCnOAfUaNml7csPStQR21Cfcksj 8LPugY4JWffHC+JnxxHLQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrfedvuddgtdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgfgsehtqhertddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpeevlhor mhgvnhhtucfnrghsshhivghurhcuoegtlhgvmhgvnhhtsehlrghsshhivghurhdrohhrgh eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgeekheefffdtfeffueevkefgfffhtddugfdugeeugeev gfduteffudfgfefhjedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomheptghlvghmvghntheslhgrshhsihgvuhhrrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i4c21472a:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 5 Feb 2024 12:28:33 -0500 (EST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment_Lassieur?= To: Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." Cc: Steve George , Felix Lechner , help-guix@gnu.org Subject: Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion In-Reply-To: <87zfwe7s6v.fsf@lease-up.com> (Felix Lechner via's message of "Mon, 05 Feb 2024 09:10:32 -0800") References: <10c82db7-6fc6-4fa0-8213-e207fa54db58@futurile.net> <87msse9a5q.fsf@lassieur.org> <87zfwe7s6v.fsf@lease-up.com> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 18:28:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87il3295xd.fsf@lassieur.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.28; envelope-from=clement@lassieur.org; helo=out4-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.36 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: -7.36 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D83E756D7D X-TUID: eCk5SgugSW7A On Mon, Feb 05 2024, Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU= System distribution." wrote: > Hi Cl=C3=A9ment, > > On Mon, Feb 05 2024, Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur wrote: > >> I don't think reviewers have to be committers. > > How much more evidence does the project need to see in order to realize > that the plan is not working? The best review I've had in years was done by a person who is not a committer. I see no evidence here. And I'm unsure which plan you are talking about (the plan?). > I'll spare the list a lengthy analysis of the social dynamics but the > delegation of competency to the bottom is an unsuccessful practice in > many places. What do you mean with "bottom"? > Maintainers must close bugs in service to the public. There is no other > way. Reviewing !=3D Closing