From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id uCSFOQnQdmbCYQAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 13:22:18 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id uCSFOQnQdmbCYQAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 15:22:18 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=freakingpenguin.com header.s=x header.b="qH/C59pp"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1719062537; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=VmgBxutIUJTNRMBn8N3cjhEpqazpwVZQA1sWBBQUEIQ=; b=MOml0mBz38PFTqydjCve3z3dfrbU1mX7ZAnndWaTHe9quwVfxmqkBD9Rky/fVTeNOC4kS2 vVIdzcPMvtAYUvaGmRlq0a6ERwppUXrx6fe4/6IniZbfDKwy6xf/tiag8TIIz+M52NTEOa cGGLlG0ondQZuahYQ98FLJOYAb9OtTJ8vMCbip+PfgZFWjQAdygON8XQt1kUuQuyYJBAkz sbi/xVildKM4Q6qBWD8fIMVUocPtYEF+LJISqOYi3UQSX0WuODX8DFy6llVZrdMNiwwayV AzxOiOwhKJXbTFDPDxQjQ4GT/mGuZgEq08fDfyJemXbtEjEumbXXMhFxSb0sWQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=freakingpenguin.com header.s=x header.b="qH/C59pp"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1719062537; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=U3vNRaLUznudlpvXiVHKnk2QKExdMhdfdUVVWE85Kr27UgFnvBqmrjki4iCOwxsB86Cqvf Kc/7kgDNeGAp+Y21KxuuSUUuaqUBVaNPnRV9db2qpOD2tSDNqs9Df2fw3D/B1mtsxKPomd 99CQkyVeZMmJxUj4EswfCwKTfe/WGfVNmpvwgaTgn5o/d+0a5xe1mMxmdznkXB+p9RNvlJ QfeLgACMM/MsGHKpjLMSihDy2rSnbMeSlOwZrDNP3gTE+FO3BAYQ2NYL0djd1uliSgbYI4 Ly2zaveFWhcGV7W80MyqZJ7R4bAF+Ns+4+t7zYLfBftV/YJYT+moqjhCUWv5Ew== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B208D15504 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 15:22:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sL0gu-00028J-BS; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 09:22:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sL0gs-000285-P6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 09:22:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sL0gs-0003gB-HI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 09:22:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sL0gs-0004i3-9W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 09:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#71700: The Archiving functionality of guix lint should be opt-in and Documented more prominently Resent-From: Richard Sent Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 13:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71700 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: MSavoritias Cc: 71700@debbugs.gnu.org, zimon.toutoune@gmail.com Received: via spool by 71700-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71700.171906247118046 (code B ref 71700); Sat, 22 Jun 2024 13:22:02 +0000 Received: (at 71700) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2024 13:21:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44689 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sL0g2-0004gz-LR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 09:21:10 -0400 Received: from mail-108-mta192.mxroute.com ([136.175.108.192]:45605) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sL0g0-0004gr-Q0 for 71700@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 09:21:09 -0400 Received: from filter006.mxroute.com ([136.175.111.3] filter006.mxroute.com) (Authenticated sender: mN4UYu2MZsgR) by mail-108-mta192.mxroute.com (ZoneMTA) with ESMTPSA id 190401b8a5a00017a3.001 for <71700@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Sat, 22 Jun 2024 13:21:05 +0000 X-Zone-Loop: 3b5bffb72874a85964c2eec6fdfbbf288e2c4860c99e X-Originating-IP: [136.175.111.3] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freakingpenguin.com; s=x; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date: References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=VmgBxutIUJTNRMBn8N3cjhEpqazpwVZQA1sWBBQUEIQ=; b=qH/C59ppEq5szXg3Kvj0QWtvx8 bGsbSng2QR6HJ9YTC58GDGlacqmrQU5UsmCw0xg6QEeg2W69i9ZviMGMBYT/a2oYQWO5LSFYfSUWE bc2QKwASNuqFypJkN5I6RD08hdrWlcJO8V2n8MHJTc456eNYKWhVEIfscvRYp+FD3lX07vGjXwT4n yyFo/5iJQKjiSWUjxAau5rLXhtYBec/JAms2AXW6ieLPuby23JCOmqhBd/gzPcOUbfN3r+gxetbQL Zaw9XEAz7IIyLSdiuYpUibTVjv/Rj6RMXtW2qlLr5wmij9anDvTCVjB4WOjo+hWCEPspxoiyBA+sA RcE+T7QQ==; From: Richard Sent In-Reply-To: <20240621194531.40c24620@fannys.me> (MSavoritias's message of "Fri, 21 Jun 2024 19:45:40 +0300") References: <20240621194531.40c24620@fannys.me> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 09:21:01 -0400 Message-ID: <87iky1azb6.fsf@freakingpenguin.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Authenticated-Id: richard@freakingpenguin.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B208D15504 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.36 X-Spam-Score: -6.36 X-TUID: UYjiN+L7i0ym I think channel level configuration of some form for code archival is a good idea so individual channels can choose to disable it. I also agree that we should make the fact that guix lint does archival more prominent. I disagree with a statement that permission is required, but I'll avoid rehashing the discussion ongoing in guix-devel. [1] I think there is a good reason to support disabling archival at the channel level. Simon, do you think your patch can/will manage that? > Somehow I disagree with this. And I propose the generic approach that > allows to exclude any checkers from the package definition using the > field properties. > > See . [1]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-06/msg00192.html -- Take it easy, Richard Sent Making my computer weirder one commit at a time.