From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id yN1WIQZ3aWcNAwAAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:43:18 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id yN1WIQZ3aWcNAwAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 15:43:18 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=qJl+ClVP; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=EW3hmWYB; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1734964997; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Wb88rUaXkP/6CWAX+EpSp7SdyJ9hEEQhJqiQvki49dc=; b=EjhXClcfsb0RH7XBYc1MA6ce3GvPwzJqQwgg7AkenCjLwjrBHAVwTmDUWR9h7QwptGxh8H y3g+NGq8F7EGjRBehgi0kv3ekrLStg/j7pGxCI250/wLP6JZUe07h3lrtTJW/g5tPB0et7 eYEl1ZKByxexaXTNuOTLtrVk9mTtTWvvWR1ugxyU4ymUTLe9qMezCQ5L8U7QMMyAch6ckn izh6K3RwkQqPX2teJZYpM8LCxARZcvktQWnyQ3woqGnwwmCjdr9o9AITaXgGN3VFnfvfsp LWP9RJFKlLAp9e423abr3RPW727saRXbZ7yqZuFWGzIQnFD4iEtgZImShKgxfw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=qJl+ClVP; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=EW3hmWYB; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1734964997; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=srKAhFon5boxT2SrzIF0YM7gnCyuOT9YhPy8VmJkZJJptRWIbKKp3853LkWXyo4oEyKW3c HhZALEHe7at0qONOTzuv7M0ayI4UnU58OIwmSany/dsjnBp1Bickt5aV/nNOqixBIMYxln I5kmtcHZ2W2iESPVsQxGQGGP9HM4DmfC6+l/FPHif0tYxVJ8srwemr6lK32Lq5FxFH4aXt TdOD3HyBLXCpZtDXj5NfRvC4AR+Ghhk8z6caEck0CjUPRF3RrOyLkINYTqr6QYvb50ilPU YfcFhgdPO5xJ9f49Ms1vmPT3maelep20tnmMw1fRpgcH1/C11SYBfs4hZLUKyw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBCCF1D78E for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 15:43:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tPjeC-0000Zz-7W; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 09:43:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tPjeA-0000Zm-OD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 09:43:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tPjeA-00018I-8I for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 09:43:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=Wb88rUaXkP/6CWAX+EpSp7SdyJ9hEEQhJqiQvki49dc=; b=qJl+ClVPfpgtZ2vOcl+487JHEXbg/g3RZ8UgoFN+zg389AqWhSWSIKAQbYxnCK2JOTJGTHwo0jKjZxNJaPQ9XanQ/DCz0SNjdFf81nG+SSmLd/s7JwVwrNHEt0u4TNpJHSEeoM6t30B3XkMD5K+nBRaWXo8gM+rmV9XoECdtx9X4951k3iT8yYog52/NbVtuc11t42WUZzFqJo7uNU1UTUwv+ZkaCrYYYY1GgfQz4INa9xMM3aSsuahiMOhULAyP6XS5KTwfHcyzXPtZlPIExTddz4nDgpErRrAvWVvSYlDm7K6XpuC03cC6bQptgCNhJoJpQViLP+M15SxHeK+uPg==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tPjeA-0000dG-2l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 09:43:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#74736] [PATCH v2 0/1] Add Request-For-Comment process. Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74736 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: =?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez Cc: 74736@debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Tournier Received: via spool by 74736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74736.17349649632398 (code B ref 74736); Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:43:02 +0000 Received: (at 74736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Dec 2024 14:42:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53859 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tPjdr-0000cc-26 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 09:42:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43250) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tPjdm-0000cG-NS for 74736@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 09:42:41 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tPjdg-00017G-J8; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 09:42:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=Wb88rUaXkP/6CWAX+EpSp7SdyJ9hEEQhJqiQvki49dc=; b=EW3hmWYBnO2id9SZDjle Q2Z0Zr21iYEEQgaKsIKpoj8tbNXKRHbGW0kLQ0Ty9lab2XcBXtc66deZ//aUAivrZyb8IHPr6AAg3 hsVALVpVOLeoZRyuPhd38atzTeSeYPl6+4tMJpZaDXyEeLCRQ18iMr0jPAGSyECWfthg5LgtWRuEi Iac9rYz9YMZIQ4+wA1C9Vi394H1z1uyhdJbHWT0O2KwXLiyTZyFLgPJiRl6a2QNS4EX9u3MM9U4Ek 8FFSsHlhVvMTdI1YVWF0jY8G11uJKTSDwpgX/EpSfRLCyotTiGF+GOMaRWyBhFBZgDyHPnR/f+d3c Rmr/x/1QBF7ViA==; From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?No=C3=A9?= Lopez"'s message of "Sun, 22 Dec 2024 14:56:56 +0100") References: Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 15:42:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87ikraea0f.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -8.81 X-Spam-Score: -8.81 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: BBCCF1D78E X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-TUID: 8siQp4FjjRoh Hi No=C3=A9, Thanks for this new version. No=C3=A9 Lopez skribis: > +### Submission (up to 7 days) > + > +The author submits their RFC proposal as a regular patch and look for > +co-supporter(s). See =E2=80=9CCo-supporter=E2=80=9D section. > + > +Once the RFC is co-supported, it marks the start of a discussion period. [...] > +### Last call (up to 14 days) > + > +The author publishes a final version of the RFC and a last grace period > +of 14 days is granted. People are asked to agree or disagree by > +commenting: > + > +- +1 / LGTM: I support > +- =3D0 / LGTM: I will live with it > +- -1: I disagree with this proposal > + > +At least half of people with commit access must express their voice with > +the keys above during this last call. We need to be sure that the RFC > +had been read by people committed to take care of the project, since it > +proposes an important change. > + > +When a positive consensus is reached, the RFC becomes effective. If not, > +the proposal is archived and the status quo continues. It seems unchanged compared to v3. WDYT of my comments, suggestions, and proposed wording: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/74736#9 ? I think we should now make sure we reach consensus on the timeline, and in particular: 1. on the voting process; 2. on the submission -> withdrawn transition, in case nobody supports the RFC. Once we have that, we can fine-tune the language and hopefully be done within a couple of weeks. I like the Dot graph you submitted! Here=E2=80=99s an updated version, wit= h a new submission -> withdrawn arrow (as proposed in the comment above) and with hopefully clearer names (in particular =E2=80=9CVoting Period=E2=80=9D= rather than =E2=80=9CLast call=E2=80=9D): --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- digraph "RFC Timeline" { submission[label=3D7=C2=A0days>] comments[label=3D30=E2=80=9360=C2=A0days>] last_call[label=3D14=C2=A0days>] withdrawn[label=3DWithdrawn, shape=3Drectangle] final[label=3DFinal, shape=3Drectangle] =20=20=20=20 submission -> comments submission -> withdrawn comments -> last_call last_call -> withdrawn last_call -> final =20=20=20=20 withdrawn -> submission [label=3D"New version"] =20=20=20=20 comments -> withdrawn } --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Thoughts? Thanks for getting the ball rolling! Ludo=E2=80=99.