From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nils Gillmann Subject: Re: regarding commit 3ccdd4305ef76e7c5c10554a9d1c338c3362078f Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 03:07:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87h9hdpdlp.fsf@grrlz.net> References: <87pow29hsn.fsf@grrlz.net> <20160212231331.GA28977@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48229) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUPcW-0004Rr-C5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 21:07:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUPcS-0004ge-6K for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 21:07:36 -0500 Received: from latitanza.investici.org ([82.94.249.234]:33556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUPcR-0004gQ-Td for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 21:07:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160212231331.GA28977@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:13:31 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 02:31:20PM +0100, Nils Gillmann wrote: >> I believe to keep it consistent (sorry for being inconsistent in >> the beginning), my email address should be a valid one >> (change to ) and my >> name change from Ni* to Nils Gillmann in the patch commited to >> gnunet.scm. >>=20 >> I wonder, is this too small a change to send in as a patch? it's >> just some characters in the header of the file. > > Some committers' attributions are different in different files in the > source tree. I think it's okay to be inconsistent =E2=80=94 this sort of > information does change as time passes. okay, did not notice this before. > > If this is really bothering you, then I don't see a problem with > changing it except for the (very minor) noise in the log. Otherwise, how > about we wait until the next time you have a change for gnunet.scm? Okay, works for me, next time I have some additions / changes I change it myself. Thanks, --=20 ng