From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: add lispf4
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:36:39 +0100
Message-ID: <87h9hb55zs.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <87y4ax3cf2.fsf@grrlz.net> <87wpqgea7v.fsf@grrlz.net>
	<20160208003608.GA6080@jasmine> <877fifxxgg.fsf@grrlz.net>
	<20160208201442.GB2854@jasmine> <87twliekjc.fsf@grrlz.net>
	<20160209091632.0453f67c@debian-netbook>
	<87egcggd88.fsf@grrlz.net> <877fi7u2yx.fsf@elephly.net>
	<87k2m77zcn.fsf@grrlz.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48720)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aV4Lc-0000mX-70
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:36:52 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aV4LZ-0002gw-1o
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:36:52 -0500
Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:25633)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1aV4LY-0002fQ-Pa
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:36:48 -0500
In-reply-to: <87k2m77zcn.fsf@grrlz.net>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nils Gillmann <niasterisk@grrlz.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


Nils Gillmann <niasterisk@grrlz.net> writes:

> open("SYSATOMS", O_RDONLY)              = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
> write(2, "Can't open 'SYSATOMS'\n", 22Can't open 'SYSATOMS'
> ) = 22
> exit_group(1)                           = ?
> +++ exited with 1 +++

Does this also happen when you run lispf4 from the very same directory
that contains SYSATOMS?  It seems to me that we should patch the sources
such that it opens SYSATOMS with its full path.

~~ Ricardo